Mass protests as G7 commits to climate chaos

June 12, 2015
More than 35,000 demonstrators marched peacefully in the Bavarian capital Munich on June 4.

Tens of thousands of anti-capitalist, environmental and social justice activists took to the streets and country roads of Bavaria in Germany to protest the Group of Seven (G7) nations summit, which took place on June 7 and 8 in a secluded castle in the German Alps.

More than 35,000 demonstrators marched peacefully in the Bavarian capital Munich on June 4. They protested the destructive policies of the G7 industrialised nations — climate change, militarisation and NATO expansion in Europe, economic austerity and poverty, democracy-destroying free trade deals and more.

On June 8, 8000 protesters marched through the alpine resort town of Garmisch-Partenkirchen, a few hours south of Munich, in the shadow of Germany’s highest mountain, Zugspitze.

The meeting between the leaders of the G7 nations — the United States, Britain, Canada, Italy, France, Japan and Germany — was held nearby at Schloss Elmau, a picturesque castle converted into a luxury hotel, at a cost of approximately US$350 million.

Climate change success?

The issue of climate change was presented as a key success story of the summit, especially by Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel.

The G7 nations have pledged to work towards “a decarbonisation of the global economy” by the end of the century, with a 70% cut in greenhouse gas emissions on 2010 levels by 2050.

Germany, the US and Britain already have much stronger targets, but the pledge is being described as a “diplomatic coup” for getting Canada and Japan — regarded as “climate recalcitrants” — to sign up.

Some groups have welcomed the announcement as a signal that the world was moving away from fossil fuels. But the time frame still fails to match the urgency of the climate science, which demands a rapid shift to renewables and immediate, severe cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has previously said that to meet the internationally agreed target to limit warming to below 2°C — the level often quoted as needed to avoid the “most dangerous” effects of global warming — global emissions in the electricity sector would have to reach zero before 2050.

Jennifer Morgan, director of the global climate program at the World Resources Institute, told The Guardian on June 9 that a target of zero fossil fuels by 2100 would not keep warming below 2°C.

“It totally depends on the pace of the decarbonisation,” she said. “You either need to be there by 2050 for CO2 and a bit later for all greenhouse gases if you want a high chance of staying below 2°C.”

The G7 pledge is highly unlikely to stop a global temperature rise of 2°C, but some hope it can help secure an “ambitious, binding agreement” at international climate talks scheduled for Paris in December.

However, a June 6 Oxfam report, Let Them Eat Coal, shows that coal use in five of the G7 nations actually rose between 2009 and 2013. Only the US and Canada have lowered their reliance on coal since the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009.

“The G7’s addiction to coal is hiking up costs for developing countries and putting more and more people on the frontline of climate change at risk of hunger,” warned the report.

“If G7 coal plants were a country, it would be the fifth biggest emitter in the world. They are still burning huge amounts, despite efficient, affordable, renewable alternatives being available.”

Japan has come in for particular criticism for approving 52 new coal-fired power stations, while Canada is also investing heavily in opening up its tar sands to exploitation.

The G7 also pledged to help create a US$100 billion a year fund from 2020 that developing countries can access to help a transition to renewable energy.


As well as climate action, Natalia Alonso, head of Oxfam’s European Union Office, highlighted some of the protesters’ other concerns in a June 2 statement.

“Today 85 people own as much wealth as half the world’s population,” Alonso said. “At least US$18.5 trillion is hidden by wealthy individuals in tax havens worldwide representing a loss of more than $156 billion in tax revenue; money that could be invested in promoting equitable and sustainable growth and jobs.

“Europe’s dependence on dirty energy is pushing up fuel prices and driving climate change, which means higher food prices in Europe and across the world.

“If leaders don’t break their fossil fuel habit, poor people may be left to choose between eating and heating.”

Inside the G7 summit itself, discussion ranged from economy and trade, energy and climate change, as well as a session on fighting terrorism.

Few tangible commitments emerged from the summit, but the ongoing crises in Ukraine and Greece also cast a long shadow over proceedings.

For the second year in a row, Russia was excluded from the summit. It was expelled from the G8 after its annexation of the Crimea from Ukraine last year.

Sanctions against Russia for “aggressive behaviour” in the region were reaffirmed, with ominous threats of “further restrictive measures” and “further steps” if it did not comply.

The ongoing stalemate in Greece also cast its pall over the meeting, as negotiations between Greece's left-wing SYRIZA government and its international creditors stalled again on the eve of the summit.

Before the meeting, Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras warned the G7 that time was running out for Greece to avoid bankruptcy, and an exit from the eurozone.

There is a growing fear that no deal will be struck, and Greece will be forced out of the eurozone with potentially dire consequences for the European and world economies.

'Free trade' controversy

One of the biggest issues for the G7 protesters — uniting everyone from anarchists to environmentalists and farmers — was opposition to the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) trade deal.

The TTIP has been negotiated in secret between the United States and the European Union. The draft text is known only by the negotiators, a group which includes representatives of multinational corporations.

Not even members of the European and national parliaments, or the US Congress, have been allowed to see the text.

As well as concerns about the economic and environmental implications of such a far-reaching and secretive free trade agreement, the TTIP threatens to fundamentally undermine national sovereignty of signatory nations.

A proposed clause — the so-called Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement procedure — would grant corporations the right to sue governments for passing laws that “breach” the TTIP and threaten to damage their profits.

Wrapping up the summit, G7 leaders indicated their intention to have the TTIP agreed within “the next six months”. However, events in the European Parliament have put a dampener on those hopes.

A vote planned to endorse the European Union’s negotiating position on the TTIP on June 10 was cancelled at the last minute, after more than two hundred amendments to the motion were submitted.

Discussion on the bill was also cut short after MEPs voted by a margin of only two votes to suspend the debate.

The European United Left/Nordic Green Left (GUE/NGL) group released a statement criticising the cancelling of the debate. It said it was designed to hide the fact that there was growing disunity among pro-TTIP parties.

The GUE/NGL also called for genuine public consultation on the TTIP and trade policy in general, and a suspension of the TTIP negotiations.

Meanwhile, public opposition continues to grow. An online Stop TTIP petition has received more than 2 million signatures, while thousands more have joined a campaign emailing MEPs with their concerns over the deal.


Given all of this, the mass protests are hardly surprising — nor the fact it faced heavy police repression.

Some protesters dressed as clowns and others carried rainbow flags and banners bearing slogans such as “Stop the G7 now!”, “G7 go to hell” and “Revolution is the solution”.

More than 22,000 police were deployed to protect the summit — the largest police operation in Bavarian history — and 17 kilometres of temporary fence line was erected to keep protesters out.

The police presence was so heavy in Garmish-Partenkirchen that traffic jams of police vehicles became a frequent occurrence in the small town.

The protests were overwhelmingly peaceful, dominated by a carnival atmosphere, with families and children taking part. Organisers of the Stop Elmau alliance — the coordinating group for the protests — expressed hope that the demonstrations would not turn violent.

On June 6, however, police pepper-sprayed and baton-charged one section of the protests in Garmish-Partenkirchen, resulting in several injuries to both protesters and police.

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.