Nepal: Natural disaster brings unnatural suffering

Issue 
Bhaktapur in the Kathmandu Valley in the wake of the earthquake.

A 7.8-magnitude earthquake struck Nepal on April 25. By May 1, 120 aftershocks had occurred. The death toll had passed 7800 by May 8 and will almost certainly reach 10,000 or more, as information trickles in from the rural areas. More than 16,000 people are injured and this number will also rise.

A natural disaster had been expected for decades, but there is nothing natural about the outcome. The capacity of the government and international agencies to respond has to be understood in the context of Nepal’s history of underdevelopment, poverty and inequality. Whether in rural areas or in Kathmandu, it is the poorest who always suffer the most. The earthquake is no different.

It is dire poverty that is turning the earthquake into a tragedy of immense proportions. Nepal is among the world’s poorest countries, with a human development ranking of 145 out of 187 countries. Levels of inequality are on the rise and are unsustainable, and discrimination against ethnic minorities and indigenous groups remains rampant.

In urban areas many houses are badly built, there is overcrowding, and access to piped water is difficult at the best of times. Cuts to electricity — known as load shedding — is a constant problem, particularly for the poorest who cannot afford alternative sources. Rural settlements are isolated from population centres because of poor roads and unreliable public transport.

In 2005, the UN said more than 90% of Nepalese homes were built on an informal, individual basis and there has long been a well-documented need for a huge program of house building and upgrading. No wonder, then, that although a lot of modern city buildings withstood the shocks, there are many reports of devastation in the villages.

The prognosis for the coming weeks is grim. With water and sewage pipes burst, there are fears of cholera and other infectious diseases.

Part of the responsibility for this desperate situation lies with the West. Nepal has never been directly colonised, but it was subject to centuries of domination by imperial powers. From the mid-19th century, Britain backed the brutal and repressive Rana regime that kept much of the population in a state of chronic underdevelopment for over a century. Following the transfer of power from the Rana regime back to the monarchy, western powers backed the monarchical regime, known as the panchayat.

Political parties were banned and Nepal was relatively isolated. Development was a significant part of the nationalist ideology of the panchayat, but subordinate to it. The regime was overthrown in 1990 through a popular mobilisation.

Since the mid-1980s, when Nepal became indebted through World Bank-imposed structural adjustment, there have been enforced cuts to already minimal development, public services and welfare programmes.

Subsequent dependence on foreign aid has unquestionably made Nepal more vulnerable to donor-imposed conditions and further debt. These in turn have produced political pressures that have forced Nepal to align foreign and domestic policy to Western interests.

For international donors, who have been working in Nepal since the early 1950s, development has always been secondary — their effort primarily went into preventing the spread and influence of communism and promoting free market ideas. For example, the overthrow of the Rana regime in 1950-51, combined with the perceived threat of communism following the Chinese Revolution, led the US to establish a presence in Nepal.

The aim was to weaken communist influence from China and India, particularly in the countryside, by promoting rapid economic growth.

US officials were conscious of the fact that it was precisely the colossal levels of poverty and inequality that made the peasantry receptive to communist ideas. But the US failed in these efforts. Communist parties grew in popularity and, following the 1990 people’s movement, the Maoists rose to prominence fighting a People’s War.

Breaking this communist influence has also been the objective of aid programmes in recent decades. As the Maoists developed a growing base of support on the basis of struggle against poverty and inequality, Western governments — and their regional allies such as India — did everything in their power to stem the Maoists’ influence.

Development was mainly a political project meant to strengthen Western, pro-neoliberal interests. Poverty eradication was subordinate to these broader economic and political interests.

The result is a country with a barely functioning infrastructure and, despite consistent earthquake warnings, predictions as to its size and scale, and numerous high-profile projects on disaster preparedness and emergency response, the past few days have shown these to have had little useful impact.

Under these circumstances, the response of the “international community” in financial terms has been pitiful. Ordinary people and the Nepali diaspora around the world are clearly horrified by the tragedy, but governments have pledged meagre amounts of aid. Perhaps shamed by public reaction, the US upped its initial offer of $1 million to $10 million on April 27.

The British government, despite its long-standing, exploitative relationship with Nepal, only belatedly pledged £15 million and a 60-member search and rescue team, upped from £5 million and a handful of advisors.

The British public has now given more than double that of the British government — Disasters Emergency Committee has raised over £31 million in public donations. Even now only a handful of helicopters are operating shuttle missions into Nepal’s interior. It is a travesty that the Nepal government has to choose between rescuing those in the worst-hit rural communities and those on the mountains.

The UN’s appeal for £270 million is significant, but still a fraction of what will be required to ensure immediate relief. But most shockingly, none of the funds that have been pledged by international donors have actually been transferred to Nepal.

These sums are not only grossly inadequate, but they are being delivered unacceptably slowly. The US, Britain and India and other regional military powers are capable of rapid response when their security or economic interests are threatened. It is appalling that the same urgency cannot be focused on humanitarian relief and reconstruction. The West has an obligation, given the history.

Even if billions are eventually provided, as they were in Haiti, co-ordination remains a challenge. Aid is getting through to some areas, but people are angry that it is not reaching them quickly enough and there is no transparency about how foreign aid in particular is being distributed. One of the problems with the aid effort is that it is driven by competition.

The government of Nepal should be in charge of co-ordinating relief efforts and aid money. Much of the relief work is already being done by the Nepal Army, local organisations and the efforts of individuals on the ground. The stories that have come out about people pulling together are uplifting.

Reliable research now exists showing the link between Nepal’s last major earthquake in 1934 and the latest one, and suggesting that there will be another earthquake in the coming decades. The UN and the government estimate that more than 300,000 homes have been destroyed or damaged, but the number is almost certainly higher. When rebuilding begins, it is imperative that all homes are earthquake-proofed.

But the unmistakeable fact is that questions of democracy and development are linked. The key to development lies with the social and political struggles of the Nepali people, to which foreign interventions have been hostile.

[Abridged from Open Democracy.See the appeal from a leader of Nepalese community in Australia below.]

Nepal: How Australians can help

Bharat Nepal, president of Australia Nepal Public Link Inc, issued the following appeal for aid in the days after the April 25 earthquake: "As you all know a very devastating earthquake hit Nepal on April 25. More than 5000 people were killed and thousands more are still missing. Outside of Kathmandu is also badly affected, however due to remoteness, damage has still not been fully appraised.

"There is great need for health care, food and water. I am coordinating to raise funds in Australia to address this crisis. If you can please support by donating to the following account, all money raised will be sent to National Disaster Relief Fund in Nepal. Thank you so much."

Australia Nepal Public Link Inc.
National Australia Bank
BSB 082 342
A/c. no. 83 719 7693
Please state "Earthquake support" as transaction ID

If you like our work, become a supporter

Green Left is a vital social-change project and aims to make all content available online, without paywalls. With no corporate sponsors or advertising, we rely on support and donations from readers like you.

For just $5 per month get the Green Left digital edition in your inbox each week. For $10 per month get the above and the print edition delivered to your door. You can also add a donation to your support by choosing the solidarity option of $20 per month.

Freecall now on 1800 634 206 or follow the support link below to make a secure supporter payment or donation online.