UNITED STATES: We won't accept 'separate but equal'

November 17, 1993
Issue 

Separate is not equal. That's the message of the gay civil rights movement that has burst forth across the US, inspired by the fight for the right of gays and lesbians to marry. Elizabeth Schulte, Steve Trussell and Sherry Wolf report.

Thousands of gays and lesbians lined up at City Hall in San Francisco when Mayor Gavin Newsom announced on February 12 that the city would issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, in defiance of state law.

"A lot of us had already said 'I do' in our own private ceremonies years earlier", said Kathryn Lybarger, describing the scene. "But the tears coming down this time came from the understanding that we were saying 'I do' together, for the first time in history. My friend James said it felt something like the end of apartheid, or the Berlin Wall coming down."

By February 20, more than 3000 couples had taken part in wedding ceremonies. "There's going to be a lot of push around the country for gay marriage now", Phyllis Lyon said.

Lyons and her partner of 51 years, Del Martin — both longtime gay rights activists — were the first to be married. "Everybody is looking at their constitution," she said. "It has pushed the issue up to the front."

Last week, 26 gay and lesbian couples got their marriage licenses in Sandoval County, New Mexico, before the state attorney general announced that the licenses were invalid. Chicago Mayor Richard Daley was forced to tell the press that he would be in favor of issuing marriage licenses to gay couples. In Massachusetts, the fight is on to defend recent state Supreme Judicial Court rulings that grant full marriage rights to gays and lesbians.

Declaring "separate is seldom, if ever, equal", four of the court's seven judges argued that a state senate bill granting civil unions and banning gay marriage was unconstitutional. A two-day Massachusetts constitutional congress ended in a stalemate on February 11-12, as supporters and opponents of gay marriage faced off in the state house — and in the streets outside. More than 1000 supporters of gay marriage spontaneously turned out to raise their voices — as did the anti-gay bigots.

Compromise?

Massachusetts legislators will reconvene on March 11. Some Democratic legislators have said that they will propose "compromise" legislation that bans gay marriage and grants vaguely worded civil unions. But gay rights supporters can't afford to compromise.

"This is just a savvy political move on the part of people who don't want gay marriage", Whitney Weiss, an Emerson College student who protested around the clock at the Massachusetts state house said. "As of May 17, there will be gay marriages happening, and this is going to create a momentum that will make the civil-unions compromise look asinine. Anything other than real equality is unconstitutional."

Supporters of gay and lesbian civil rights have a fight on our hands. In California, after a restraining order requested by the right-wing Campaign for California Families was denied in court, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger stepped forward to say that he would stop the marriages in San Francisco.

And nationally, President George Bush sent a clear message to his religious supporters in his January State of the Union address that the White House would try to pass a federal ban on gay marriages.

Democrats

So far, much of the outpouring of support for gay marriage has happened spontaneously. Many Democratic politicians who are considered allies of gays have proved that they won't be offering leadership on this issue — for fear of rocking the boat during the 2004 election campaign.

For example, Representative Barney Frank — Massachusetts' only openly gay member of Congress — called on San Francisco's mayor to stop issuing same-sex marriage licenses, warning that the time "wasn't right".

"I was sorry to see the San Francisco thing go forward", Frank told the Associated Press. "When you're in a real struggle, San Francisco making a symbolic point becomes a diversion."

But what the recent events in San Francisco show is the huge potential for activism around the issue of gay marriage — and support among ordinary people who clearly understand that this is a civil rights issue.

Support

On February 16, African-American syndicated columnist Derrick Jackson called on Black church leaders to step up to bat. "If today's ministers stood up with courage to acknowledge their link to the cause of gay civil rights", Jackson wrote, "they will find out that it will do no damage. They might find out that it will give them even more allies in their own fight for equality in America."

In a significant step forward for the labour movement, several Massachusetts unions — including Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Locals 509 and 2020, the Massachusetts Teachers Association, the Massachusetts Nurses Association and state United Auto Workers union — have come out in support of gay marriage or against any ban or both.

"When we went to our local's executive board, I almost cried," Tom Barbera, a rank-and-file member of SEIU Local 509 and co-chair of the local's Lavender Caucus, explained.

"All 40 board members unanimously voted to endorse the fight against the constitutional amendment and to support the supreme court decision on gay marriage. The right to marry isn't just a flimsy thing for individuals. They love each other, and they should have the same rights as any other couple. A lot of people are beginning to understand that."

We have to organise — in our communities, workplaces and schools — to turn up the heat on politicians who are dragging their feet on gay marriage. "A lot of folks are shocked at the mayor for doing the right thing, and draw the conclusion that it does matter whom you vote for", said Lybarger. "But many of us see that Newsom's action has really shown up the spinelessness of the Democrats around him.

"We can't rely on them — Kerry doesn't support gay marriage — to win our rights for us. Newsom also could not have done what he did if there wasn't broad public support for it. We need to build a movement on that support, and on the new hope and confidence coming out of this, to defend these gains and win full civil rights."

[Reprinted from Socialist Worker, the paper of the US International Socialist Organisation <http://www.socialistworker.org>.]

From Green Left Weekly, March 3, 2004.
Visit the Green Left Weekly home page.

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.