Colombia: Massacre in Tumaco as US pushes for more repression

A wounded protester is carried away after police opened fire on a demonstration in Tumaco on October 5.
Thursday, October 12, 2017

The Colombian National Police massacred between 8 and 16 people, and wounded more than 50, in the municipality of Tumaco, Narino on October 5. The attack was directed against protesting coca growing families demanding the government fulfil its commitments to voluntary eradication programs.

Then, on October 8, the National Police attacked an international team sent to investigate the massacre. The police used tear gas and stun grenades to disperse representatives from the United Nations, the Organization of American States, and a journalist from the Colombian weekly, Semana.

The National Police and Colombia’s military are both under the direction of the Ministry of Defence.

Initially, the Colombian government claimed that the massacre was the result of an attack by dissident insurgents who oppose accords between the Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia – People’s Army (FARC-EP).

However, witnesses from the community said that the violence was perpetrated by the police.

Since the implementation of the accords, Tumaco has been the site of several assassinations of local leaders and attacks against protesters by the armed forces and paramilitaries.

Peace accords

Colombian peace accords were implemented as law in November last year. They include provisions for crop substitution and infrastructure development to create a viable alternative to illicit crops.

Under the National Comprehensive Program for Illicit Crop Substitution, the Colombian government has signed 105,000 crop substitution pacts with rural families. It is estimated that its goal of crop substitution programs for 50,000 hectares will be reached by the end of the year.

The government has also forcibly eradicated another 50,000 hectares during the same period, often in the same areas where it has signed substitution agreements.

Even when substitution pacts have been signed, they have been beset with delays in payments and infrastructure and road improvements. Some peasant families complain that they must travel through areas of paramilitary activity to access benefits.

Another difficulty has been that some communities requesting to participate in the voluntary program have been ignored and subjected to forced eradication.

The United States is pressuring Colombia to abandon the voluntary program in favour of forced eradication, which frequently results in state violence. The White House is also urging Colombia to return to aerial fumigation of illicit crops with Monsanto’s RoundUp Ultra.

US opposition

US Vice President Mike Pence, Ambassador to Colombia Kevin Whitaker and the Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs William Brownfield have declared that the US will not support voluntary eradication programs because they are the result of accords signed between the Colombian government and the FARC-EP.

It does not seem to matter that these accords have brought an end to a 52-year civil war that left more than 220,000 people dead, 92,000 disappeared and six million rural families displaced.

Nor does it matter that the FARC-EP no longer exists and former insurgents have disarmed. The new FARC, the Common Alternative Revolutionary Force, is a legal, non-violent and civilian political party that is integrated into civil society.

The White House justifies its position by repeating the myth that the now defunct FARC-EP have been and continue to be major narcotics traffickers. However, both Colombian and US government studies have debunked this assertion.

It is generally recognised that the FARC-EP had levied a tax on narco-traffickers, but had not been major producers or merchants of narcotics. A 2001 Colombian government study found right-wing paramilitaries to be responsible for more than 40% of the cocaine trade and the FARC-EP for no more than 2.5%.

Donnie Marshall, the head of the Drug Enforcement Agency under former US president George W Bush, has gone on record saying: “there is no evidence that any FARC or ELN [National Liberation Army] units have established international transportation, wholesale distribution or drug money-laundering networks in the United States or Europe.”

According to Rafael Suarez, who was a military advisor to the administration of former Colombian president Alvaro Uribe: “if you reduce the FARC to just a drug cartel, you make the possibility of negotiating a political settlement more difficult.”

War against farmers

Of course, if the goal is not peace, but the consolidation of stolen lands, then the strategy of branding the FARC-EP as major drug traffickers and carrying out a “war on drugs” that is really a war of displacement and a war against farmers works well.

On the other hand, Uribe was on a Defence Intelligence Agency list in 1991 as one of Colombia’s top narco-traffickers. His administration received billions of dollars in US funding via Plan Colombia.

William Brownfield first came to the US State Department in 1979, during the Jimmy Carter administration. He was promoted to his current position as an Assistant Secretary of State under former president Barack Obama.

Before that, he had served as Ambassador to Colombia during the Uribe administration and as Ambassador to Chile and to Venezuela. He has had assignments with the State Department and the Pentagon’s Southern Command in El Salvador, Argentina, Panama and Honduras.

He is accused of helping cover up an incident in which four Honduran community members, including two pregnant women, were killed by shots fired from a State Department helicopter in 2012. He has announced his imminent retirement.

But given his long background as a promoter of the US Empire, his pronouncements against voluntary eradication programs in Colombia are chilling.

On August 2, Brownfield said that: “The United States is not currently supporting the Colombian government’s voluntary eradication and crop substitution program because the FARC is involved...

“In 2016, 675 attempted eradication operations were cancelled in the field due to restrictive rules of engagement that prevented security forces from engaging protestors [sic].”

Peace and justice

We of the Alliance for Global Justice are intimately familiar with circumstances facing rural Colombian families who are forced to cultivate illicit crops such as coca, marijuana and poppies.

We have seen again and again rural villages that lack schools and teachers (or that have schools with virtually no supplies), health services, electricity or any viable way to get crops to markets.

In such cases, families turn to the cultivation of illicit crops because narco-traffickers are the only economic interests who will travel to these villages to make purchases.

For the United States government to demand forced eradication over voluntary programs constitutes nothing less than a cynical call for bloody repression of Colombian farming families.

The US does not want peace in Colombia. It wants more death and displacement so that access to natural resources is cleared for transnational corporations.

It wants Colombia to exist first and foremost as an outpost of Empire and a threat to the stability of the entire region.

We who love peace and justice want something very different. We know that a Colombia at peace and rooted in justice would be a major step towards peace, justice and liberation from Empire throughout Latin America and, indeed, the world.

[James Jordan is a national co-coordinator of the US-based Alliance for Global Justice. Slightly abridged from Afgj.org.]

Issue