Eleven days before he was sacked Prime Minister Gough Whitlam asked “whether any duly elected reformist government will be allowed to govern in the future?“ Bevan Ramsden looks at the context of the dismissal.
Eleven days before he was sacked Prime Minister Gough Whitlam asked “whether any duly elected reformist government will be allowed to govern in the future?“ Bevan Ramsden looks at the context of the dismissal.
Bevan Ramsden asks whether federal Labor’s fears of another United States intervention in domestic politics, such under Gough Whitlam, underpins its enthusiastic acceptance of AUKUS?
The release of the Palace letters between the governor general and the Queen have given renewed impetus for a republican movement, writes Jim McIlroy.
The Australian High Court has ruled that correspondence between the Queen and the Governor-General of Australia, her viceroy in the former British colony, is no longer "personal" and the property of Buckingham Palace, writes John Pilger. Why does this matter?
Gough Whitlam was a maverick social democrat who believed a foreign power should not be allowed to dictate Australia’s economic and foreign policies. There seems little doubt the US was involved in his sacking.