Our Common Cause: For a nuclear-free future!

November 17, 1993
Issue 

Led by PM John Howard, a growing chorus of Coalition politicians are urging a turn to nuclear power as the "solution" to greenhouse-gas driven climate change. They are attempting to force open the door to more uranium mining and nuclear power production in Australia.

Climate change is one of the biggest threats to the survival of humanity and the planet, but the nuclear "cure" would be as bad as the disease.

Myth: Nuclear power is "greenhouse free".

Fact: Huge amounts of energy are needed to construct nuclear power plants and produce nuclear fuel, generating substantial greenhouse gases.

Myth: More use of nuclear power would reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Fact 1: To replace fossil fuel-generated electricity with nuclear power would require a five-fold increase in the number of nuclear reactors, but would reduce global greenhouse emissions by only 5-10% — nowhere near the 60% reduction required to stabilise atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases. Meanwhile, the extra 1760 reactors required would produce 2.6 million tonnes of high-level nuclear waste over a 50-year lifespan.

Fact 2: There are many viable alternatives — geo-thermal, wind, solar and tidal power — that generate considerably less greenhouse emissions per unit energy than nuclear power.

Myth: Nuclear power is safe.

Fact 1: An expansion of nuclear power would inevitably lead to the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The "peaceful" nuclear power and research sectors have produced enough fissile material to build more than 110,000 nuclear weapons. Claims that the international safeguards system prevents misuse of "peaceful" nuclear facilities and materials are grossly overstated.

Fact 2: Nuclear reactors create a constant danger of catastrophic accidents, due to mechanical failures or human error. The 1986 Chernobyl accident caused an additional 200,000 deaths in Russia, the Ukraine and Belarus between 1990-2004.

Myth: Nuclear waste can now be safely stored.

Fact 1: There is still no safe storage system for nuclear waste. Not a single repository exists for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste, which is produced at an annual rate of about 10,000 tonnes worldwide. Radioactive waste is a public health and environmental threat that will last for millennia.

Fact 2: Reprocessing spent reactor fuel is polluting, and most of the uranium and plutonium arising from reprocessing is simply stockpiled with no plans for its use.

The renewed push for nuclear power in Australia is being driven by corporate greed — by the huge mining companies' search for ever greater profits. Australia has 30% of the world's proven uranium ore reserves. With the global demand for uranium increasing, the market price for uranium has tripled in the last two years.

Between 1981-96, Australia exported an average of 3400 tonnes of uranium oxide concentrates per year. In 2004-05, this increased to 11,215 tonnes. This earned the mining companies $475 million.

The ALP must oppose the nuclear push.

Labor's current policy recognises that uranium mining presents "unprecedented hazards and risks" and advocates no new uranium mines. But the pressure is building on Labor to change its policy at its 2007 national conference, and a growing number of ALP leaders are indicating that they are happy to do the mining corporations' bidding.

We call on all ALP members to ensure that their party does not capitulate to the mining corporations' greed, and to demand that Labor close the door forever on uranium mining and nuclear power in Australia.

Uranium mining and nuclear power can be stopped — we've done it before. The only serious proposal to build a nuclear power plant in Australia — at Jervis Bay in NSW in the late 1960s — was defeated by public and political opposition. In the late 1990s, the proposed development of Jabiluka uranium mine in the Northern Territory was halted by a concerted national and international campaign.

The Socialist Alliance is campaigning for a nuclear-free future and real solutions to climate change, including:

  • No nuclear power plants.

  • No new nuclear reactors and the immediate closure of the HIFAR reactor.

  • Closure of the Ranger, Roxby Downs and Beverley uranium mines, and no new mines.

  • No dumping of nuclear waste: waste producers must manage their own waste in secure, monitored facilities at their own expense.

  • No new coal-fired power stations.

  • More investment in clean, safe technologies and renewable energy infrastructure.

  • Establishment of an industry-funded 10% renewable energy target by 2010.

  • Full public ownership of all energy/electricity industries.

[For the full text of this statement, visit <http://www.socialist-alliance.org>.]

From Green Left Weekly, May 31, 2006.
Visit the Green Left Weekly home page.


You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.