'Welcoming refugees to Europe is a moral and political necessity'

March 13, 2016
People express support for welcoming refugees in Dresdon, Germany in December.

European citizens have launched a sign-on appeal for refugees the website of the Transform network. Involving 28 European organisations from 19 countries, Transform is a network for analysis and research associated with the Party of the European Left.

The appeal comes in response to worsening attacks on refugees in Europe, which includes French police destroying the living quarters of asylum seekers in the refugee camp at Calais. Macedonia closed its border completely to undocumented migrants on March 9, after Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia announced tight new restrictions on migrant entry, TeleSUR English reported that day.

The appeal is reprinted from Transform-Network.net.

* * *

We citizens of the member states of the European Union, of the Schengen Area (encompassing 26 European countries that have abolished passport and any other type of border control at their common borders), the Balkans, of the Mediterranean, and of the Middle East, as well as citizens of other countries in the world, who share our concerns, are launching an emergency appeal.

We are appealing to our co-citizens, to our government leaders and our representatives in national parliaments and in the European Parliament, as well as in the European Court of Human Rights and in the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. The refugees must be rescued and welcomed!

For years now, immigrants from the southern Mediterranean fleeing poverty, war and repression have been drowning at sea or been dashed against barbed wire. When they have succeeded in crossing the sea, after suffering extortion at the hands of smuggler rings, they are expelled, incarcerated or thrown into a clandestine existence by the states that designate them as “dangers” and “enemies”.

Despite this, they are courageously persevering and helping each other to save their lives and create hope for a future.

Middle East wars

But since the wars of the Middle East, and especially in Syria, have assumed the proportions of mass slaughter with no end in sight, the scale of the situation has altered.

Held hostage between the warring parties, bombed, starved and terrorised, entire populations have been thrown into a perilous exodus that, at the price of thousands more dead, pushes men, women and children towards neighbouring countries and knocking at Europe's doors.

This is a major historic and humanitarian catastrophe. It presents us with a responsibility of which there is no way out.

The incapacity of the governments of all our countries to put an end to the causes of this exodus (if they are not indeed contributing to their exacerbation) does not exonerate them of the obligation to save and welcome the refugees, while respecting their fundamental rights. These rights, including the right to asylum, are enshrined in the foundational declarations and conventions of international law.

Europe's governments have refused to face the overall situation, to explain it to their populations, and to organise solidarity and go beyond national egoisms. There are only a few exceptions — Germany's exemplary initiative, an initiative that has still not been suspended; and the gigantic effort by Greece to rescue, welcome and escort the thousands of survivors who daily arrive on their shores, even if its economy has been plunged into devastating austerity; to which should be added Portugal's willingness to relieve Greece's burden by taking a share of refugees.

Overwhelmingly, from east to west and north to south, Europe's governments have rejected the minimal plan for distributing the refugees worked out by the European Commission, or are involved in sabotaging it. Worse, they are engaging in repression, stigmatisation, and the brutalisation of refugees and immigrants in general.

The situation of the “jungle” of Calais in France, followed now by its violent dismantling, in disregard for the spirit and letter of a court decision, is a scandalous, though not the only, illustration of this.


By contrast, it is the citizens of Europe and elsewhere — fisherpeople and inhabitants of Lampedusa in Italy and Lesbos in Greece, activists of refugee relief and immigrant support networks, lay and religious shelter centres, endorsed by artists and intellectuals — who have saved our honour and pointed the way to a solution.

However, they are running up against insufficient means, and sometimes the hostility of public authorities. They have to face, like the refugees and immigrants themselves, a rapidly growing European xenophobic front ranging from violent, openly racist or neo-fascist organisations to “respectable” political leaders and governments increasingly overtaken by authoritarianism, nationalism and demagoguery.

Two completely incompatible Europes are facing each other, and from now on we have to choose between them.

This xenophobic tendency, which is deadly for the victims of violence and ruinous for the future of the European continent as a space of liberty, must be reversed immediately.

With 60 million refugees in the world, Lebanon and Jordan receive 1 million of them each (representing, respectively, 20% and 12% of their populations), and Turkey receives 2 million (3%). The million refugees who arrived in Europe in 2015 (one of the richest regions in the world, despite the crisis) only represent 0.2% of its population!

Not only do the European countries, taken as a whole, have the means to welcome the refugees and treat them with dignity but they must do so in order to continue to lay claim to human rights as the foundation of their polities.

It is also in their interest if they want to begin to recreate the conditions for peace and collective security, along with all the countries of the Mediterranean area that have shared the same history and same cultural heritage for thousands of years.

And this is what has to be done to remove from our horizon, once and for all, the spectre of a new epoch of organised institutional discrimination and of the elimination of “undesirable” human beings.

Nobody can say when and in what proportion the refugees will “go back home”, and nobody should underestimate the difficulty of the issue to be solved, of the resistance which it generates, and the obstacles and dangers it carries with it.

But nobody can continue to ignore the will of the populations to receive refugees and the refugees' wish to integrate. Nobody has the right to declare the problem unresolvable in order to evade it more easily.

Emergency measures needed

Very large-scale emergency measures thus are needed immediately.

A plan to provide assistance to refugees from the Middle East and Africa in the framework of a state of emergency has to be proclaimed and implemented by the governing bodies of the EU and carried out by all the member states. It has to be upheld by the United Nations and be the object of a permanent consultation with democratic states of the whole region.

Civilian and military forces have to be deployed, not to carry out a coastal guerilla action against the “smugglers” but to bring aid to the immigrants and to put an end to the scandal of the drownings at sea.

It is in this framework that it will possibly be necessary to “crack down” on the traffic and condemn the complicity that benefits from it. It is prohibiting legal access that generates Mafioso practices, and not the inverse.

The burden of the frontline receiving countries, in particular Greece, must immediately be relieved. Their contribution to the common interest must be recognised. For them, unacceptable isolation must be reversed into solidarity.

The Schengen free-circulation area must be preserved, but the Dublin Regulation that provides for pushing immigrants back to the entry country must be suspended and renegotiated. The EU should pressure Danube and Balkan countries to reopen their borders and negotiate with Turkey to convince it to stop using refugees as a political-military excuse and bargaining chip.

At the same time, air and sea transport has to be used to transfer all the registered refugees to the northern European countries that are objectively able to receive them, instead of letting them accumulate in a small country in danger of becoming a detention camp and a “dumping ground” for humanity.

In the longer term, Europe — facing one of the great challenges that is changing the course of the history of peoples — has to develop a democratically controlled aid plan for the survivors of this huge slaughter and for those who are helping them.

It has to establish not only refugee quotas, but also social and educational aid, proper housing, and therefore a special budget and legal provisions guaranteeing new rights that embed the displaced populations in the receiving societies in a dignified and peaceful way.

There is no other alternative. It is either hospitality and the right to asylum or barbarism!

Like the article? Subscribe to Green Left now! You can also like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.