John Pilger: Time to recognise Blair's crimes

February 25, 2012
Issue 

In the kabuki theatre of British parliamentary politics, great crimes do not happen and criminals go free.

It is theatre after all; the pirouettes matter, not actions taken at remove in distance and culture from their consequences. It is a secure arrangement guarded by cast and critics alike.

The farewell speech of one of the most artful, Tony Blair, had "a sense of moral conviction running through it", effused the television presenter Jon Snow, as if Blair's appeal to kabuki devotees was mystical. That he was a war criminal was irrelevant.

The suppression of Blair's criminality and that of his administrations is described in Gareth Peirce's Dispatches from the Dark Side: On Torture and the Death of Justice, published in paperback this month by Verso.

Peirce is Britain's most distinguished human rights lawyer; her pursuit of infamous miscarriages of justice and justice for the victims of state crimes, such as torture and rendition, is unsurpassed.

What is unusual about this accounting of what she calls the "moral and legal pandemonium" in the wake of 9/11 is that, in drawing on the memoirs of Blair and Alistair Campbell, Cabinet minutes and MI6 files, she applies the rule of law to them.

Advocates such as Peirce, Phil Shiner and Clive Stafford-Smith have ensured the indictment of dominant powers is no longer a taboo. Israel, the United States' hitman, is now widely recognised as the world's most lawless state.

The likes of Donald Rumsfeld now avoid countries where the law reaches beyond borders, as do George W Bush and Blair.

Deploying sinecures of "peace-making" and "development" that allow him to replenish the fortune accumulated since leaving Downing Street, Blair's jackdaw travels are concentrated on the Gulf sheikhdoms, the US, Israel and safe havens like the small African nation of Rwanda.

Since 2007, Blair has made seven visits to Rwanda, where he has access to a private jet supplied by President Paul Kagame. Kagame's regime, whose opponents have been silenced brutally on trumped-up charges, is "innovative" and a "leader" in Africa, says Blair.

Peirce's book achieves the impossible on Blair: it shocks.

In tracing the "unjustifiable theses, unrestrained belligerence, falsification and wilful illegality" that led to the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, she identifies Blair's assault on Muslims as both criminal and racist.

She writes: "Human beings presumed to hold [Islamist] views were to be disabled by any means possible, and permanently ... in Blair's language a 'virus' to be 'eliminated' and requiring 'a myriad of interventions [sic] deep into the affairs of other nations'."

Whole societies were reduced to "splashes of colour" on a canvas upon which Labour's Napoleon would "re-order the world".

The very concept of war was wrenched from its dictionary meaning and became "our values versus theirs". The actual perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks, mostly Saudis trained to fly in the US, were all but forgotten.

Instead, the "splashes of colour" were made blood-red ― first in Afghanistan, land of the poorest of the poor. No Afghans were members of al-Qaeda; on the contrary, there was mutual resentment. No matter.

Once the bombing began on 7 October 2001, tens of thousands of Afghans were punished with starvation as the World Food Programme withdrew aid on the cusp of winter.

In one stricken village, Bibi Mahru, I witnessed the aftermath of a single Mk82 "precision" bomb's obliteration of two families, including eight children.

"TB," wrote Alastair Campbell, "said they had to know that we would hurt them if they don't yield up OBL".

The cartoon figure of Campbell was already at work on concocting another threat in Iraq. This "yielded up", according to the MIT Centre for International Studies, between 800,000 and 1.3 million deaths: figures that exceed the Fordham University estimate of deaths in the genocide in Rwanda.

And yet, wrote Peirce, "the threads of emails, internal government communiques reveal no dissent". Interrogation that included torture was on "the express instructions ... of government ministers".

On January 10, 2002, then-foreign secretary Jack Straw emailed his colleagues that sending British citizens to Guantanamo Bay was "the best way to meet our counter terrorism objective". He rejected "the only alternative of repatriation to the United Kingdom".

(Later appointed "justice secretary", Straw suppressed incriminating Cabinet minutes in defiance of the information commissioner).

On February 6, 2002, then-home secretary David Blunkett noted that he was in "no hurry to see any individuals returned to the UK [from Guantanamo]". Three days later, Foreign Office minister Ben Bradshaw wrote: "We need to [do] all that we can to avoid the detainees being repatriated to the UK."

Not one of the people to whom they refer had been charged with anything; most had been sold as bounties to the US by Afghan warlords.

Peirce describes how foreign office officials, prior to an inspection of Guantanamo Bay, "verified" that British prisoners were being "treated humanely" when the opposite was true.

Immersed in misadventure and lies, listening only to its leader's crooned "sincerity", the Labour government consulted no one who spoke the truth.

Peirce cites one of the most reliable sources, Conflicts Forum, run by the former British intelligence officer Alastair Crooke, who argued that to "isolate and demonise [Islamic] groups that have support on the ground”, the perception is reinforced that the West only understands the language of military strength.

In willfully denying this truth, Blair, Campbell and their echoes planted the roots of the July 7, 2005, attacks in London.

Today, another Afghanistan and Iraq beckons in Syria and Iran, perhaps even a world war.

Once again, voices such as Crooke's try to explain to a media salivating for "intervention" in Syria that the civil war in that country requires skilled, patient negotiation, not the provocations of the British SAS and the familiar, bought-and-paid-for exiles who ride in Anglo-America's Trojan Horse.

[First appeared at John Pilger's website.]



Comments

Excellent article. Re Blair's friend Paul Kagame and his role in the Tutsi Genocide and Hutu Genocide in Rwanda and the ongoing Hutu Genocide in the Congo see "The Politics of Genocide" by Edward S. Herman and David Peterson. Re Iraq deaths, according to the 2006 Revision UN Population Division data, medical literature data, and other authoritative sources, the Iraqi Holocaust has been associated with 1.2 million post-invasion non-violent avoidable deaths; 1.5 million violent post-invasion deaths; and 0.8 million post-invasion under-5 infant deaths (90% avoidable and due to gross US Coalition violation of the Articles 55 and 56 of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War which demands that an Occupier supplies food and medical requisites to “the fullest extent of the means available to it.” In addition, avoidable deaths under Sanctions (1990-2003) totalled 1.7 million, violent deaths in the Gulf War totalled 0.2 million and under-5 infant deaths under Sanctions totalled 1.2 million. Iraqi refugees (both inside and outside Iraq) total 5-6 million. The ongoing Iraqi Holocaust (1990-2011) involves 1.7 million violent deaths, 2.9 million non-violent excess deaths, 4.6 million violent and non-violent excess deaths, 2.0 million under-5 infant deaths, 1.8 million avoidable under-5 year old infant deaths and 5-6 million refugees – an Iraqi Genocide according to the UN Genocide Convention definition of “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group“ (Google "Iraqi Holocaust" and "Iraqi Genocide" ). In his Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech in 2005 (when some estimates had put post-2003 invasion Iraqi deaths at 100,000) Jewish British playwright Harold Pinter stated: "We have brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation and death to the Iraqi people and call it 'bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East'. How many people do you have to kill before you qualify to be described as a mass murderer and a war criminal? One hundred thousand? More than enough, I would have thought. Therefore it is just that Bush and Blair be arraigned before the International Criminal Court of Justice" (see: http://www.countercurrents.org/arts-pinter081205.htm ) 4.6 million? More than enough, I would have thought. And it doesn't stop there. Post-invasion violent deaths plus avoidable deaths from war-imposed deprivation total 5.6 million in Afghanistan, 2.2 million in US-, Ethiopia and Kenya-invaded Somalia and circa 50,000 in Libya (Google "Muslim Holocaust", and "Muslim Genocide"). And now the genocidal, racist Neocon American and Zionist Imperialists (NAZIs) and their UK, NATO and Apartheid Australia allies want the devastation of Syria and Iran. Dr Gideon Polya, Melbourne

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.