Vic nurses dispute: breakthrough possible

What point or points Anonymous is trying to make is unclear, besides pointing out that "Nurses in ALL public hospitals have NOT walked out of work TWICE a day for the past TWO weeks". Yes I know that is literally true. At my partner's workplace, Sunshine Hospital, nurses and midwives have walked out of work twice a day for the past two weeks - not all of them, enough each time to have a public presence, and there has been a scale down since the latest FWA threat about 10 days ago. But I've also had to go in this period to the Royal Children's twice, where they don't do stoppages for unsurprising reasons. I don't know the extent of actions generally. If Anonymous has better information or a point to make out of it she or he isn't very clear. I've no idea what point Anonymous means by "Unremarkably, there is no mention of the ANF resolutely defying the orders of the compliant umpire, Fair Work Australia". That GLW should be highlighting the past defiance (as previous articles have)? That GLW should be denouncing the union from not continuing the defiance after only gaining a resumption of talks? Anonymous also seems to be claiming that the pro-Labor ANF was too timid under the previous government. I wouldn't be surprised: some more detail might others understand the dispute, although I don't know how much this should be hammered in the relatively short news items that the GL coverage has consisted of. Maybe GLW should provide space for a more critical "comment" article if Anonymous or anyone else has substantial things to say. This is a very important dispute. The union has pushed the envelope to some extent although I'm sure there's grounds for criticism. Some informed comment, whether in articles or comments under them, would be better than vague and unclear apparent criticisms. Nick Fredman.