Tax staff accept ATO pay deal

November 18, 2011

In a November 9-15 ballot, Austalian Taxation Office (ATO) staff voted 57% to 43% to accept management’s proposed enterprise agreement.

This was the second all-staff vote. The previous version of the enterprise agreement was rejected by 59% to 41%.

The two drafts did not differ much. Both provided for a pay rise of 9% over three years. The final version includes two once-off bonuses, but these are dependent on meeting certain targets which may not be achieved.

One reason for the different outcome of the two votes was the changed position of the Australian Services Union (ASU). At the time of the first vote, the ASU and the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) both urged a “no” vote.

By the second vote, ASU Tax Branch secretary Jeff Lapidos had changed his position. Even though the Tax Branch Council of the ASU favoured a “no” vote, Lapidos was able to circulate numerous emails to all ATO staff in the name of the ASU, urging a “yes” vote.

The other factor was that no industrial action was taken, nor was any proposed by the CPSU leadership. This was because any such action would have been illegal in the particular circumstances of the ATO.

The new agreement will cover all employees below the level of the Senior Executive Service. Previously there had been two separate agreements. Most ATO staff had been covered by an agreement expiring in June this year, but some others were covered by an agreement expiring in June next year.

The Labor government’s Fair Work Act is written in such a way that, as long as some workers were covered by an agreement, it would have been illegal for any workers in the ATO to strike, even those whose previous agreement had expired.

The CPSU ran an effective propaganda campaign, highlighting the double standard whereby the Commissioner of Taxation is expecting a 58% pay rise while the majority of staff will only get 9% over three years. Posters on this theme adorned many workers’ desks.

But without any prospect of industrial action, many workers became skeptical that a significantly better deal could be obtained.


so much for the rewards for delivering the change program and going through the hell of this process.
the ATO management oiffers extra allowance for performing duties at the level higher than official classification (not Higher Duties but the other allowance in 2011 agreement). However, the problem is that at the same time the ATO management allowed me to take such type of work only if I complete my normal duties. This is a very sophisticated way of discrimination for people with disability. The person who is not so phisically and/or mentally strong (let say disable) has a small chance to participate in such work and allowance. Taking into consideration the system of streamlined promotions, while the fact of performing H.D. in the past was favorited for the purpose of sign off potential candidates, what is going to happen, now? Actually, we are approaching an legislatively approved form of employment discrimination of disabled employees of even those from non-English speaking background. I hope the Fair Work Comission will not let it happening!!!!! Especially after many capable, but disabled GST Field Officers were significantly demoted in their duties to start this crazxy race for recognition for another 10 years!!! Congratulations, well done all of you unionists who 'sold' our rights for being paid for GST/CE duties performed for 2000- 2008 above the officially attached classifications, especially APS4 Officers. I hope to see more comments about it and CPSU response.

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.