Stadium, poverty and environment polarise Tasmanian election

July 24, 2025
Issue 
This anti-stadium rally drew thousands on May 10 in nipaluna/Hobart. Photo: Philippa Skinner

As predicted the July 19 Tasmanian election returned a hung parliament. While counting continues, the Liberals have received an overall swing of 3.2%, winning 14 seats, four short of the required majority to form government in their own right.

Labor is sitting on 10 seats (with an overall -3.3% swing) while the Greens (with an overall swing +0.7%) have won five.

Four independents have been elected, three of whom are progressive. Independents Kristie Johnston and Craig Garland were reelected and anti-stadium candidate Peter George was elected, as was former Labor leader David O’Byrne.

At the time of writing, the ABC said neither major party will win the 18 seats required to form government. It is also reporting that the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers candidate Carlo Di Falco has a chance of being elected. The Jackie Lambie Network did not contest.

The major parties have been approaching the independents, but not making public their plan to achieve government.

Johnston said she will not enter a formal deal with either major party, but provide support on merit. O’Byrne, who received a +2.5% swing, said he was happy to talk to either major party.

Garland, Johnston and George issued a joint statement on July 24, saying the suggestion that only one major party has a mandate to form government is “simply incorrect”.

They said “like other crossbench members we will be speaking to both major parties about confidence and supply”. While informal discussion had begun, they said they would not begin formal discussions until the result is confirmed – likely next week. They also said that they are “not in a formal or informal alliance”.

The overall results can be interpreted as voters being uninspired by the major parties.

George told Green Left: “Tasmanians have witnessed wasted years with the failure of either of the two old parties to focus on the issues you correctly identify — housing, health, education — and squandered opportunities to rebuild Tasmania’s economic base.

“Much of this is the result of the corporatisation of both old parties, captured by multinationals and lobbyists who run the state through parties with policies so similar they might as well be in coalition.” George said he contested the election, at an age of 74, out of “despair” which, he suspects, many share because housing, education, health are “all in crisis”.

Independents running against the wasteful stadium plan and support for industrial salmon farming received good support, with Garland receiving a +5.1% swing in Braddon, ahead of the Greens, and Johnston receiving a +7.4 swing in Clarke. Cecily Rosol, the Greens candidate in Bass, received a swing of +4.8%. Greens party leader Rosalie Woodruff standing against George was reelected, but with a -6.1% swing.

Tasmania has some major social problems for which neither major party had solutions. As of March, there were 5056 applicants on the social housing waitlist, 3098 of which were classified as highest priority. The average wait time to receive social housing is 82 weeks.

The problem is compounded by a shortfall in housing construction: In the most recent quarter, just 706 homes were built, falling far short of the 1306 target.

Meanwhile, Tasmania faces an unmet housing need of approximately 8100 dwellings, underscoring a long-term neglect of public infrastructure. These issues have led to a worsening crisis of affordability and access.

More than one-third of all renters are under housing stress, with severe, or even extreme, levels for pensioners or JobSeeker recipients. Anglicare Tasmania reported on June 26 that rents have surged by approximately 43% since 2020. TasCOSS estimates that around 120,000 Tasmanians live in poverty.

Despite 75.1% of residents telling the Salvation Army that housing affordability and homelessness as major concerns, and 36.6% saying it was an issue for themselves, the major parties had little concrete to say during the campaign. The Liberals promoted its “build-to-rent” policy and incentives for developers and Labor offered a token first-home‑buyer relief.

Recurring budget deficits and promises to spend $785 million on a new stadium at Macquarie Point have made people angry.

Despite 69% of Tasmanians opposing the new stadium, the major parties support it. Labor’s decision to change its position to support for the stadium would not have helped its election prospects.

George said the “the task is daunting”, adding, “If there is to be hope, the two old parties need to recognise the benefits of minority government and take advantage of it. We need to be governed by the best not by the worst.”

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.