New project maps Australia’s nuclear sites

September 28, 2012
Sites related to the nuclear industry, including mines, waste dumps, reactors, military sites, uranium deposits and weapon test is a new online educational resource which brings together information, photos and videos about more than 50 of Australia’s nuclear sites including uranium mines and processing plants, the Lucas Heights research reactor, proposed reactor and dump sites and British nuclear weapons test sites.

Community groups are welcome to put the map on their own websites − for more information visit An A2 poster is also being produced and distributed to community groups at cost price.

Another feature of the website is the interactive “Chernobyl in Australia” map, which allows people to choose potential nuclear power reactor sites around Australia and different wind directions to map resettlement and radiological control zones in the event that something went terribly wrong.

There is much of interest and importance at − information the nuclear industry would rather you didn't know about. Did you know that Prime Minister John Gorton's plan for a nuclear power plant at Jervis Bay in the late 1960s was driven by a secret nuclear weapons agenda? Did you know that whistleblowers uncovered a global uranium cartel in 1976 leading to an international controversy and fines totalling hundreds of millions of dollars?

Bringing information on Australia’s nuclear sites together in one place allows for observations and comparisons that would otherwise be obscured. Two such issues are discussed below − children being exposed to radiation, usually because of slack management of contaminated sites, and the related problem of radioactive contamination problems that have persisted for decades.

Radiation exposure

Due to the lack of fencing, the contaminated Port Pirie Uranium Treatment Complex site was used as a playground by children for several years. The situation was rectified only after a six-year community campaign led by Friends of the Earth.

After mining at Rum Jungle in the Northern Territory ceased, part of the area was converted to a lake. As a crocodile-free water body in the Darwin region, the site became popular despite the radioactivity.

In November 2010, the Rum Jungle South Recreation Reserve was closed due to low-level radiation in the area. The Department of Resources advised the local council to shut down the reserve as a precautionary measure.

This year, damage to a security gate allowed children to enter a contaminated site near Kalgoorlie. More than 5000 tonnes of tailings from the Yeelirrie uranium deposit, near Wiluna, were buried there in the 1980s. BHP Billiton said it would improve security.

In a 1997 report, Western Mining Corporation (WMC) admitted leaving the contaminated trial uranium mine at Yeelirrie, Western Australia, exposed to the public with inadequate fencing and warning signs for more than 10 years.

A spokesperson for WMC said a 1995 inspection revealed the problems and also admitted that the company could have known about the problems as early as 1992. WMC said there was inadequate signage warning against swimming in a dam at the site, which was found to be about 30 times above World Health Organisation radiation safety standards and admitted that people used the dam for “recreational” purposes including swimming.

Children and adults alike have been exposed to radiation from the contaminated uranium processing site at Hunters Hill in Sydney (and children are more susceptible to radiation-induced cancers due to their growing bodies).

Only in recent years has the contamination at Hunters Hill come to light after decades of deceit and obfuscation. The NSW Health Commission covered up the dangers. An internal memo in 1977 told staff to “stall and be non-committal” when responding to queries. Residents were told there was “no logical reason” to carry out radiation or health tests even though the NSW government knew there were compelling reasons to do so.

A similar attitude has been displayed towards people living near the Lucas Heights research reactor. An internal 1998 federal Department of Industry, Science and Resources briefing document, obtained under Freedom of Information legislation, warns government officials: “Be careful in terms of health impacts – don’t really want a detailed study done of the health of Sutherland residents.”

Another incident with child safety concerns occurred in May 1997 when a radioactive source was stolen from an ANSTO promotional display at Menai High School. An ANSTO spokesperson said the source could be handled “quite safely but shouldn't be for long periods”. The radioactive source was never recovered.

In the 1950s, the British-Australian nuclear cabal suppressed research demonstrating the contamination of grazing sheep and cattle with strontium-90 from nuclear bomb tests in Australia. Whistleblower Hedley Marston warned that proof of widespread contamination would be found “in the bones of children”. The nuclear cabal and the Australian government initiated a testing program in 1957, but it was done in secret using stolen body parts from dead babies, stillborns and infants.

The Advertiser conspicuously failed to inform residents of Adelaide of the plume of radioactivity which contaminated the city after the bungled nuclear bomb test of October 11, 1956. The Advertiser did however run a story in 1957 titled “Radioactive Children Are Brilliant” − a baseless theory from a British psychiatrist linking strontium-90 to “brilliant” children.

Unresolved contamination issues

Unresolved radioactive contamination issues have been another recurring feature of Australia’s shameful nuclear history. There have been four “clean ups” of the Maralinga nuclear test site. The fourth was carried out in the late 1990s and it was done on the cheap. Most likely there will be a fifth clean up ... and a sixth.

The contaminated Port Pirie Uranium Treatment Complex was closed in 1962. Fifty years later, the SA government says the site is “actively monitored to provide additional information to assist with the ongoing development of management plans and potential remediation”.

Hunters Hill in Sydney has been the subject of controversy in recent years due to the failure to decontaminate a former uranium processing site, and the use of the site as residential land. The site was last used for uranium processing in 1915. Nearly a century later and there is an ongoing debate over site contamination and an appropriate location to store radioactive waste arising from site remediation. The current plan is to dump the waste at Lidcombe in western Sydney.

Not one of Australia’s former uranium mines has reached a stage were monitoring is no longer necessary. Rehabilitation and remediation of uranium mine sites has proven to be more expensive and more problematic than anticipated, with extensive time periods where ongoing management and remediation are necessary. The long-term costs − financial and public health costs − are borne by the public, not the mining companies.

Uranium exploration in the Wiluna region in the 1980s left a legacy of pollution and contamination. Even after a “clean up”, the site was left with rusting drums containing uranium ore, and a sign reading “Danger − low level radiation ore exposed” was found lying face down in bushes.

At Mary Kathleen in Queensland, there is ongoing seepage of saline, metal and radionuclide-rich waters from tailings, as well as low-level uptake of heavy metals and radionuclides into vegetation.

At Radium Hill in SA, maintenance of the tailings is required due to ongoing erosion.

At Rum Jungle in the NT, despite extensive rehabilitation and remediation of the site, the Finniss River is still polluted with ongoing acid mine drainage.

At Nabarlek in the NT, despite rehabilitation this former mine still requires ongoing monitoring and there has been ongoing site contamination and lasting impacts on water quality.

[Jim Green is the national nuclear campaigner with Friends of the Earth, Australia.]

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.