When the “not guilty” verdict in the trial of George Zimmerman for murdering Trayvon Martin was announced late July 13, spontaneous demonstrations of protest were held in cities and towns across the country. Protests have continued in the days since.
The day after the verdict, thousands marched in New York. Here are some of the voices on that march:
Marlene Duperley said: “I have a son. It’s difficult because he sees it, and he’s already had dreams about it. And he’s already had dreams about the man following Trayvon.
“He woke up and told me, 'Mom, I saw him following Trayvon'. So, I mean, he has nightmares already.
“So that’s just a part of what we have to go through every single day. And I don’t think this country realizes what we go through as a Black people and how we feel every day. And having our kids go out, we don’t know if they’re going to come home.
“And it saddens me. My heart is broken.”
Marcus Watson said: “This is something that could happen to anyone’s sons, whether you’re Black, whether you’re Latino, whether you’re Asian.
“Anyone can be taken. It’s about someone else saying that their lives mean more than yours.”
India said: “I had a feeling in my stomach, in my gut, and it felt like—I don’t know. It felt like it was my son. I cried.
“My name is India, and I’m with my daughter Kennedy, and it’s important, because I’m trying to show my daughter what—where we live and the country we live in.
“I don’t want her to think that all people are bad, but I have to let her know that there are some people out there who see Black people, brown people, people who are different from them, as less than they are, and it’s not right.
“So I try to explain to he — —this is like the perfect example. We watched the trial. We watched it every day. It was like homework.
“After camp, we sat down, and we watched it. And each individual day, we talked about it, and I discussed it with her.”
Danette Chavis said: “We still today want justice! And we will not be satisfied until justice is obtained!”
It should be noted that Black young men are disproportionally singled out for suspicion more than any other people.
More demonstrations are planned for the July 20-21 weekend.
All Black, civil liberties and civil rights groups have denounced the verdict.
The facts speak for themselves. On February 26, in the city of Stanford, Florida, in the Deep South, Martin, a 17-year-old Black man, was walking home from a store where he bought some tea and a snack.
He had no weapon of any sort, not even a penknife.
He was staying with his father in what is known in the US as a “gated community”, which means it has fences and gates to keep out “undesirables”.
Martin was not engaged in any unlawful activity or any activity other than walking and talking to his girlfriend on his mobile.
Zimmerman, a self-styled vigilante, saw Martin and decided he looked “suspicious”. What he saw was an African American teenage male wearing a “hoody”.
That was enough for Zimmerman, who called into his police buddies at the local station and reported his suspicions.
Had it been a white youth in a hoody that Zimmerman saw, he would have paid no attention.
To the daily reality of “driving while Black” leading to African-Americans being pulled over or worse, must now be added the “crime” of “walking while Black and young”, which might get you murdered.
On his call to police, Zimmerman denounced “these people” as “fucking punks” and “These assholes. They always get away.”
This time, he was not going to allow the “punk” to “get away”,
Zimmerman had a history of calling into the station to report “suspicious” people. It turns out they were all Black men.
Even the police dispatcher told Zimmerman to stay in his car and not follow Martin, an instruction Zimmerman ignored.
He got out and proceeded to stalk Martin, and started running at him. His puffing could be heard on the police tapes.
Martin began to notice he was being followed, and told his girlfriend over the phone that he was becoming concerned. She heard him being attacked, and his phone went dead.
There was an altercation, during which Zimmerman pulled his gun and shot Martin, killing him.
When the police arrived a few minutes later, Zimmerman told them he killed Martin in self-defense. Zimmerman had some minor cuts and bruises.
The police questioned him. They believed Zimmerman’s version, and under Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law, decided to release him without any charges.
There was an outcry in Black communities across the country, with large marches and other forms of protest. In face of this uproar, after a month-and-a-half charges were finally brought against Zimmerman by a special prosecutor. The special prosecutor had to be brought in due to police recalcitrance.
The trial itself was a farce. A jury was chosen that did not have a single African American on it. The jurors were not identified, ostensibly for their “protection” if they acquitted Zimmerman.
The jury was composed, we are told, of five white women and one Latina.
One of the jurors said before the trial that the earlier demonstrations demanding charges be brought were “riots”. She was not disqualified.
Although this was an open-and-shut case of racial profiling, those words were never spoken by the prosecution. Police who testified for the prosecution somehow always managed to praise Zimmerman.
The prosecution allowed the case to revolve around exactly what happened in the altercation between Zimmerman and Martin. It was Zimmerman’s version, of course, that the jury heard, not Martin’s — since he was dead.
The only witness who gave a partial version of what Martin saw was his girlfriend, who recounted the phone conversation with him. This young black woman is from Haiti, and had a Santo Domingo father, so her first languages were Haitian Creole (based on French) and Spanish. English was her third language.
The prosecution and judge stood by and allowed the defense attorney to browbeat and humiliate her on cross-examination . I had to turn off the TV coverage at that point, it was so disgusting.
After the verdict, one of the white women jurors went on TV incognito. Besides saying that she thought Zimmerman did the right thing in killing Martin, she said she discounted Martin’s girlfriend’s testimony because she had difficulty following it, since “they all talk like that”.
In any case, however vigorously Martin fought back against his attacker, the fact is that the 17-year-old did not have a gun or knife or club or stick. Zimmerman had a gun, and had enough room between himself and Martin to pull it out and kill him with one shot.
That is not self-defense. That is murder.
The case was compounded by Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law, which expanded the “self-defense” justification. Before that law, “self-defense” could not be claimed unless there was no way to flee the situation.
Over two dozen states have ratified “Stand Your Ground” laws. These laws originated with the American Legislative Exchange, a meeting of business executives and right-wing politicians founded by the fascist-minded Koch brother billionaires. It aims to help pass reactionary legislation
In her instructions to the jury, the judge explicitly used the “Stand Your Ground” law, telling them that Zimmerman “had no duty to retreat” and had a “right to stand his ground”.
In Zimmerman’s case, he had plenty of opportunity to leave the scene. But even granting the “Stand Your Ground” law, it was Martin who tried to ward off his attacker, not the other way around.
Zimmerman did not “stand his ground”. He ran after Martin and shot and killed him.
If anyone had the right to “stand his ground” it was Martin, who had only his hands to fight back with against his armed assailant.
Just a couple of weeks before the Zimmerman verdict, the US Supreme Court overturned the historic Voting Rights Act of 1965 on the grounds that racism is no longer a big deal in the US.