Festival bans pro-BDS ‘Justin Bieber’ artwork

May 13, 2011
Issue 
Van Thanh Rudd's banned artwork.

Organisers of the 2011 Human Rights Arts and Film Festival (HRAFF) have informed Melbourne visual artist Van Thanh Rudd that his artwork titled Pop Goes the System, which depicts global pop icon Justin Bieber supporting Palestinian human rights, will be banned from this year’s festival.

Rudd explained in a media release that his artwork shows Bieber — who recently performed in Israel — spray painting a logo of Israeli-owned chocolate company, Max Brenner, on Israel's separation wall in support of the pro-Palestinian boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel.

Max Brenner Chocolate has been a target of the non-violent BDS campaign due to its support for the Israel Defence Force, which took part in Operation Cast Lead — Israel’s 2009 attack on Gaza that killed more than 1300 Palestinians, including 400 children.

Rudd said the HRAFF organisers opposed displaying the piece claiming it incited “racism”, “violence” and “division”, but have refused to give him an official statement explaining why the artwork was rejected.

“I wanted to imagine if Justin Bieber decided to support the BDS campaign — what impact that would have on the youth that worship him,” said Rudd.

“There is clearly no incitement of racism and violence in this artwork. It strongly opposes it. The incitement of racism and violence clearly comes from the Israeli state towards Palestinians.

“The fact that a human rights arts festival bans an artwork that contributes to a discussion on very important human struggles shows that they breach the very position they seek to uphold and are not committed to their own mission statement, which advocates encouraging debate on human rights issues and providing festival patrons with a way to take action by connecting them to human rights campaigns.

“This week also happens to be the commemoration of the Palestinian al Nakba (catastrophe) — where over 60 years ago, over 750 000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their homeland by Zionist forces.

“Today Palestinians make up the largest refugee community in the world, with more than 7 million living in exile. So debate and action on the issue of human rights for Palestinians is crucial in their struggle for self-determination and human rights.”

Comments

I'm no art critic but it looks pretty lame to me.
Beiber's manager is a devoted Zionist. His mother is also a pro-Israel "Christian."
HRAFF, they are a joke and Hypocrites of the highest order.
How sad that a so-called human rights festival excludes one of the most important issues needed to provoke thought by all at this time. Bankers have human rights, but not Palestinians.
Whilst agreeing that Rudd`s artwork is pretty inconsequential and lame, it is surprising that it was banned. Either the Zionist lobby has a powerful influence on HRAFF, or the latter are in awe of the Zionists and self-censor in fear of being labeled anti-semites. This trick works all the time!
www.hraff.org.au/statement
He didn't go through the correct application procedures for this work, therefore it could not be hung in the exhibition. HRAFF is an organisation which aims to "make human rights accessible and engaging to everyone through creative media," this doesn't mean it doesn't have selection procedures when choosing works for their exhibitions. It has not excluded the issue, just this art work.
It is sad to see that a country such as Australia who purports to be a democracy would allow an action that prevents freedom of expression/speech. It is sadder yet to realise that the moral fiber of those who live in Australia allow such an action to go forward without more public outcry.
It seem’s a little irresponsible of Green left Weekly to print this story while missing one key element of the debate, – that Van Rudd tried to add his Bieber piece to the festival only two days before opening, without prior having it agreed to by the festival curators. ‘you can't submit work two days (before the exhibition)…, you know during the installation and have work put into the exhibition.’ - MATTHEW BENETTI – festival director - http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2011/s3216175.htm It would be an insult to all the other artists who had their work scrutinized in the application process. The only thing the festival in censoring is someone trying to get their work shown at a gallery who hasn’t gone through the legitimate paths. ‘Don't just get angry. Get informed.’ – Green Left Weekly slogan.

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.