Why Fairfax won’t report fair facts

Saturday, May 14, 2011

For many Australians, Fairfax Media is a benign alternative to Rupert Murdoch’s right-wing media empire. Well-meaning people buy Fairfax newspapers such as the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age because they believe they present a fairer picture of the news. But just how fair is Fairfax?

A clue lies in the business interests of its board of directors. Bloomberg says Fairfax director Robert Savage was the director of Smorgan Steel Group from April 2000 to August 2007. Is it in Fairfax’s interests to report climate change honestly, when doing so could harm the steel industry?

Savage was also chairman of Mincom Limited for five years until May 2007. Mincom supplies software solutions to the oil, gas and energy industries. Is it really in Fairfax’s interests to report any environmental issues fairly, when doing so could step on the toes of cronies in the oil, gas and energy industries?

Mincom also supplies software solutions to the defence industry. It boasts that it “knows what it takes to keep the military, aerospace, and defense industries’ critical assets running”. When a Fairfax director has spent years dedicated to keeping the defence industry running, could Fairfax’s hopes for peaceful solutions be tainted in any way?

But wait, there's more: Mincom also supplies software solutions to the mining industry. When Fairfax's directors have such connections, is it really interested in reporting mining issues fairly?

It certainly seems not. When Julia Gillard got rid of Kevin Rudd and his proposed mining tax, the Sydney Morning Herald fawned over her.

And it fawned over Gillard again this federal budget day. Rather than lambasting the Prime Minister for targeting struggling welfare recipients instead of obscenely rich corporations, it caricatured her on the front page as a tough-talking mining boss. The accompanying headline read: “You’re hired: Why every Australian needs to get to work.”

Ironic, then, that the very next day, Fairfax announced it had no interest in keeping its own journalists in work. It said it was pressing ahead with plans to sack a further 82, despite a bitter battle with the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance.

It’s hardly surprising that Fairfax is riding roughshod over the union. Another Fairfax director, Roger Corbett, is also an independent director of Wal-Mart stores, one of the most anti-union companies in the world.

The truth is that Fairfax is not interested in reporting fair facts. Just like Rupert Murdoch, Fairfax is interested only in making money. Any facts that seriously contest this ideology are reclassified as "opinion" and demoted to the opinion pages - if they are printed at all.

Last month, the multi-award-winning journalist John Pilger told an audience of 400 at a screening of his new film in Sydney that the retired editor-in-chief of the Sydney Morning Herald, David Bowman, subscribes to Green Left Weekly "to find out what the hell is going on".

If you want to support media that reports what is really happening in the world, free from having to promote the business interests of any directors, support Green Left Weekly. We don’t rely on advertising or big business connections to survive, but get by solely on the donations and fundraising efforts of our friends and supporters.

This year we’ve set a Fighting Fund target of $250,000. So far, our supporters have raised $71,000. You can help by making a donation to the Fighting Fund at: Greenleft, Commonwealth Bank, BSB 062-006, Account No. 901992.

Or, send a cheque or money order to PO Box 515, Broadway NSW 2007, phone in your donation on the toll-free line at 1800 634 206 (within Australia), or donate online at www.greenleft.org.au/donate.php

From GLW issue 879

Comments

Fairfax smears Chomsky

So when Osama bin Laden is slain (in what Germany's ex-Chancellor says is clearly an illegal killing) the Sydney Morning Herald celebrates it uncontroversially on its front page as VENGEANCE. AT LAST
http://www.smh.com.au/world/vengeance-at-last-20110502-1e58e.html
But when Noam Chomsky criticises that killing and wins a peace prize, it smears him as controversial and "one of America's most-hated men".
http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/books/controversy-dogs-chomsky-as-he...
Are those fair facts?

It seems some Fairfax journalists agree...

It seems some Fairfax journalists agree. Paul Kerr, writing in the Fairfax-owned BRW Magazine about BRW200 Rich List winner Gina Rinehart this week (May 25) writes:
"Despite soaring prices for her massive iron ore and coal deposits, friends say that the government’s assault on her mineral wealth was a pivotal moment for Rinehart.
"It convinced her to diversify her holdings into media, with stakes in the Ten network and Fairfax Media – although only to ensure she got her message across in order to safeguard her vast mining holdings."
From:
http://www.afr.com/p/sections/features/first_lady_gina_rinehart_6WcwDFk3...

Fairfax journalists have to comply

You're right - I'm sure Fairfax journalists wouldn't agree, because they are an unanalytical bunch. The fact is, if they wrote any articles that seriously challenged big business and capitalism, their editors would not run them and, if they persisted, they'd be out of a job. This is how corporate media works.

Fairfax

This article assumes that the business interests of Fairfax directors influence how Fairfax papers report the news. I don’t think Fairfax journalists would agree.