People smuggler hysteria is really about attacking refugees

April 20, 2012
Issue 
Refugee rights action outside Darwin Airport Lodge detention centre, April. Photo: Alex Bainbridge

In recent weeks, a boat with more than 120 refugees was forced back to Indonesia under Australian orders, 10 Falun Gong members from China docked at Darwin’s wharves and another boat made several distress calls to Australia before vanishing.

The first boat was on its way to Christmas Island when it began taking on water. A Singapore-flagged ship rescued the 120 Afghan and Iranian refugees onboard and took them back to Merak, Indonesia.

They tried to negotiate for Australian assistance, but were eventually coerced into leaving the ship. One asylum seeker onboard told the Refugee Action Coalition: “We cannot go back to Afghanistan, we cannot survive in [an] Indonesia prison. We have asked to see the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNCHR) and the International Organisation for Migration (IOM), but no one has come to us.”

The Jakarta Globe said that as others left the ship two men chanted “we want to die” and banged their heads until they bled.

The Chinese refugees, part of a persecuted religious group, were on their way to New Zealand when they arrived in Darwin on April 9. But after advice, the group apparently chose to claim asylum in Australia. They were taken to the Darwin Airport Lodge, an immigration detention facility for families and children.

Another asylum boat was apparently drifting and taking on water near Sumbawa island in eastern Indonesia when it made several calls for help on April 11 and 12. Ian Rintoul from the Refugee Action Coalition said 60 Afghan refugees were onboard, including families, without engine power and in rough waters.

After a search, Indonesian authorities claimed they found the boat on a Lombok beach, and locals said the passengers had fled.

But Rintoul maintained it could have been a different boat because he was still receiving distressed calls from them at sea on April 13. Despite this, the search was called off.

Political leaders blamed so-called people smugglers for putting people in danger. Immigration minister Chris Bowen said on April 14 that “we need to work together now to prevent another tragedy from occurring”, referring to the Coalition’s refusal to back the Labor government’s failed Malaysia-Australia swap plan.

Opposition leader Tony Abbott said “this government provides the people smugglers with a business model”.

“The only way to stop the tragedy is to stop the boats.”

But the reality is if it wasn’t so difficult for asylum seekers to come here safely, there would be no “business model” to break. Huge population displacement is rising around the world, and those who take the risk to come to Australia by boat are taking their final option.

The UNHCR said last year that 43.7 million people were displaced by conflict, poverty, famine and persecution — the highest number in 15 years.

Three million refugees were from Afghanistan alone. Almost three quarters of the world’s refugees lived in neighbouring countries. And a huge four-fifths are hosted in Third World country camps.

But there are only 880,000 UNHCR refugee places worldwide each year. The rest must rely on each country’s “resettlement quotas”, and hope that they get picked in the random lottery of humanitarian visas.

As a result, millions of people are forced into transport without government approval. This is a driving need that “people smugglers” meet.

The people who help refugees reach Australia to claim asylum are portrayed by politicians and most media as career criminals who can stage well-organised border breaches that threaten national security.

But labelling them “scum of the Earth”, as did former PM Kevin Rudd, is a politically convenient lie and another way to bash refugees and stoke racism.

Australia’s “people smuggling” laws are punitive and are designed to prevent refugees from seeking passage to Australia without government permission. Mandatory sentences of at least five years for people smugglers makes no distinction between those at the top of the operation and the impoverished men and boys persuaded to crew the boats.

The Australian Lawyers Alliance has said that as of March last year MAustralia had arrested and charged six organisers of “people smuggling” offences. A further 347 crewmembers were charged with the exact same crime. The alliance said many of these “were not aware of what they were implicated in” and “many have been tricked”.

After Rudd’s amendments to the Migration Act, there does not even have to be a profit made for people to be found guilty of people smuggling. Similarly, if a person sends financial help to family or friends overseas and it is used to pay their way here, they can be charged with “people smuggling” and sentenced to time in prison.

Conviction rates are rising and the government has made calculated moves to obstruct the defence cases of more than 350 people awaiting trial in Australia.

In December, a Victorian court was about to consider the defence of a 20-year-old Indonesian man, who said he had not committed a crime because the people he brought to Australia had been found to be refugees and so had a legal right to enter Australia.

But Labor and the Coalition introduced amendments to the Migration Act that made it illegal to bring people to Australia who had “no valid visa”. This quashed the case, but was also a direct attack on asylum seekers’ lawful right to claim asylum here.

The draconian law was even made retrospective back to 2001, making every crewmember of every boat that reached Australian waters over the past 11 years a criminal.

Exploiting fears about “boat people” will not stop them boarding boats. Toughening laws and locking out the poor does not reduce the war, persecution, rape and torture that they flee.

But increasing the penalties for “people smuggling” means there will be less crew willing to travel, encouraging operators to just cram more people onto boats and hike up prices. This is what has made the journeys more dangerous and led to more people drowned at sea.

Criminal lawyer Edwina Lloyd, who defends Indonesian boys thrown into adult jails as “people smugglers”, says there is an easy way to eradicate people smugglers: organise to bring refugees here for free.

If Australia’s refugee policy were genuinely humane, more people would have the chance to seek refuge safely, knowing they would be welcomed and given the protection to which they are entitled. The Australian government could dramatically raise its intake of refugees and help them resettle.

Diverting the millions now spent on Australia’s detention centres and the ridiculous “border control” system could easily fund this.


Comments

In the past, displaced people from war, persecution or famine could find new frontiers, or new colonies, to settle. This is not the case now due to global overpopulation. Where are refugees to go? They can't go to Antarctica or the Sahara desert. The developed nations are under pressure, but countries like Australia already have high immigration policies, and only a small percentage are refugees or humanitarian placements. Our cities, environment, costs of living, lifestyles and food security is under stress from population growth. We need some leadership from our Australian government on population growth - but all we get is silence.
It is important for industry to have lots of people to sell to, and access to their public money via the government to bail them out when things go bad . In the past, a large population was seen as crucial in defending your country if under attack, but nowadays the problems far outweigh the benefits of sustaining a large population. One sobering truth is that if humans for any reason were infertile for more than 30 years, humans would go extinct. All this desperate tussle for land and resources and vigourous posturing belies the fact that we are extremely vulnerable as a species, and very short-lived so far compared to most others. In the meantime, 'mean-times' are the only thing left as we've pushed ourselves to the brink and used up our credit card of choices. We can only hope to look after ourselves and our own future despite what's going on in the rest of the world. Many countries are hoarding grain and not exporting it like they used to. Most countries will barely be able to look after their own people let alone any others. Everything we do is anthropocentric and centred around us and not the planet or our place in nature, or even how we have to breath and eat to survive. Obsessed with saving other humans all the time, we are ignoring our life support system. Humanitarian as a notion, maybe should be replaced by concepts and terms such as Planetarian or Lifetarian. "Humans are a great species, but I'd hate to have the job of fixing them".
I don’t believe the line that this is about breaking people smugglers or safety of asylum seekers. As clark&dawe said on ABC TV 7.30 report, we could "Send safe boats to pick them up!". But this is really about our fear for our comfort, not their safety, right? Any "SOLUTION" will need to recognise that as a political reality but it seems to me that government is letting fear reign on asylum seekers. Perhaps we might even admit asylum seeker policy is less about "orderly process" & more fundamentally about fear of sharing, and then instead of continuing to be blinded by fear we might be able to see ways to make sharing beneficial to all. Our unsustainable social economic environmental model is the underlying problem. An idea I think has merit because of its sound triple bottom line foundations is to offer asylum seekers 15hrs/wk work developing public 'eco' housing & gardens in exchange for food, accommodation & a dollar adjustment up to the value of unemployment benefits (see http://bit.ly/fAWRjc) Now that the High Court has spoken we should start processing of all asylum seekers and refugees on Australian soil without further delay. This processing should be quick and efficient and take no more than three months. We should not consider returning to the Pacific Solution of the Howard Government. The prolonged detention of asylum seekers has proved to be the main cause of unrest in the detention centres and the cause of the high incidence of mental illness among the detainees. Mandatory detention and the off shore processing of asylum seekers has failed to deter asylum seekers from accessing our shores. It has proved to be extremely expensive for the taxpayers, especially at this time of financial uncertainty. A clear majority of Australian voters believe that asylum seekers should be "processed" in Australia. We should address these issues without delay and in accordance with the UN Convention on Refugees signed by Australia in1954. @landrights4all
Those who just sit behind their computer/ phones an judge these poor refugees are just as worst as the media. To, the person who wrote the comment "more love, less breed" you know what? unfortunatly for you our population is doubling every single year. You know what? it may be even TRIPLING. Our society is based around SEX,LOVE AND EMBRACE. Thank You, Cherish
Not very nice. you see our world revolves arounf love UNFORTUNATELY FOR YOU.

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.