As part of an international agreement signed in Toronto in 1988, the federal government committed Australia to a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by the year 2005. But a new round of debate over Australia's energy and environment policies has been sparked by an Industry Commission report arguing that the proposed reduction would cause a 1.5% annual decline in economic output (about $6 billion).
The IC report argued that adjustment costs would be concentrated in particular regions and industries, such as coal.
Some debate has focussed on the pros and cons of a carbon tax (increasing the price of fossil fuels) as a policy instrument for curbing greenhouse emissions.
In the following pages, we present varying views on different aspects of the energy/greenhouse debate: Greenpeace proposals on biases in existing energy policies, an article from an official of the United Mineworkers, a study on greenhouse and forests, and conclusions of a report by the British consultancy London Economics.
Greenhouse and energy policy
Issue
If you like our work, become a supporter
Green Left is a vital social-change project and aims to make all content available online, without paywalls. With no corporate sponsors or advertising, we rely on support and donations from readers like you.
For just $5 per month get the Green Left digital edition in your inbox each week. For $10 per month get the above and the print edition delivered to your door. You can also add a donation to your support by choosing the solidarity option of $20 per month.
Freecall now on 1800 634 206 or follow the support link below to make a secure supporter payment or donation online.