Tully hydro project unnecessary

October 2, 1991
Issue 

Tully hydro project unnecessary

By Bill Mason

BRISBANE — The proposed Tully-Millstream hydro-electric project in north Queensland could be postponed if electricity demand were reduced, a consultant has told the federal government.

The project has previously been criticised as posing a significant threat to a number of rare animal and plant species in World Heritage-listed wet tropical areas.

Consultant Dr Hugh Saddler, of the Canberra company Energy Policy and Analysis, said reducing demand would require a fundamental change of attitude and activities by the Queensland Electricity Commission and most of the state's power industry.

Saddler's comments came from draft notes on the state government-initiated Tully-Millstream task force report handed down last year.

In another report to the federal government, obtained by the Brisbane Courier-Mail, the Australian Heritage Commission said that Queensland had about 40% excess generating capacity throughout the 1980s and there was evidence to suggest that alternative power sources existed.

The report found that the QEC had "consistently and grossly over-estimated the rate of growth in electricity use".

The heritage commission concluded that "there are several alternatives" to the scheme.

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.