New Scientist: Direct action works

Issue 

Alex Milne

We now have scientific confirmation that sit-ins, rallies and boycotts are more likely to influence the government's environmental policy than schmoozing to politicians.

A study by American sociologist Jon Agnone, published in New Scientist on August 28, analysed the impact of the green movement in the US between 1960 and 1994. Agnone found that each protest raised the number of environmental bills passed by 2.2%. Neither lobbying politicians nor the state of public opinion made any difference.

The timing of these protests is also vital, with environmental legislation getting a 200% boost in congressional election years.

The study also found that protest groups lose their edge when they become part of the system, and their most effective weapon is disruption. "If you make a big enough disturbance then people have to recognise what you are doing", said Agnone.

Groups like Friends of the Earth and the Wilderness Society, which have an emphasis on forest blockades and city rallies, are therefore more likely to be effective than lobbying organisations such as the Australian Conservation Foundation.

From Green Left Weekly, September 15, 2004.
Visit the Green Left Weekly home page.


If you like our work, become a supporter

Green Left is a vital social-change project and aims to make all content available online, without paywalls. With no corporate sponsors or advertising, we rely on support and donations from readers like you.

For just $5 per month get the Green Left digital edition in your inbox each week. For $10 per month get the above and the print edition delivered to your door. You can also add a donation to your support by choosing the solidarity option of $20 per month.

Freecall now on 1800 634 206 or follow the support link below to make a secure supporter payment or donation online.