Greens under pressure to sell their souls to the 1%

July 13, 2012
Issue 
Greens federal parliamentarians.

Australian Greens leader Christine Milne and the party's MPs and Senators stood up to immense pressure from the big parties and the mainstream media to support some form of “offshore processing” of refugees (either in Malaysia, as the Gillard Labor government wants, or Nauru, as the Abbott Coalition opposition demands). The Greens stood firm against offshore processing and mandatory detention of refugees.

This attack over refugees was followed by a string of ALP leaders declaring that they would freeze out the Greens in future preference deals. The likes of Paul Howes and Michael Danby want to direct ALP preferences to the Coalition or to reactionary religious parties like Family First over the “extremist” Greens.

The long-view purpose is to ratchet up huge pressure on the Greens to join the Lib-Lab pro-corporate bipartisanship, a pressure that may already be having an effect on Greens policy, according to NSW Greens member and writer Hall Greenland.

“There can be no doubting the moral and political courage of the federal Greens MPs after their magnificant stand on refugees two weeks ago and their resistance to unrelenting mass-media hysteria ever since,” he wrote on July 12. “So it appears to be a surprise that these same MPs led such a determined charge to drop the inheritance tax from the party platform at the Greens’ National Policy Conference in Adelaide last weekend.

“The 'party room' (as the federal MPs are called) moved for the deletion of the plank in an abbreviated debate – about ten minutes – in which Bob Brown seized the mike to spell out the reason for the elimination: it was electoral poison and costing us one or two percent of the vote. That was it. Truly. (Incidentally, the policy in question was a commitment to an inheritance tax on estates above $5 million, with family home, family farm, small business and bequests to spouses excluded.)

“The only votes cast against the dropping of the tax came from the entire NSW delgation. The move was carried 65-12.”

Greenland added that this move fitted in a strategy of courting “Green businesses”.

“The thinking is that there are firms out there with a real interest in an ecologically sustainable economy and that they can be split away from the Business Council of Australia and the Australian Industry Group to form a capitalist base for the Greens. As one of the leaders said – I think it was Bob Brown – this new alliance will also 'afford us new funding opportunities'.”

Another major disappointment of the policy conference, Greenland wrote, was “the initiative to drop from the platform any reference to particular countries (like Tibet, Palestine, East Timor and West Papua) and instead develop specific off-platform resolutions on these matters. This issue will be further thrashed out at the November policy conference but it is likely that NSW will be the one dissenting state.”

The two big parties and mainstream media have attacked the left of the NSW Greens before. An assault of their support for a boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign against Israeli apartheid led to the NSW Greens watering down its policy on Palestine.

However, the Greens policy remains clearly to the left of the ALP, by Greenland's account.

“The industrial relations policy adopted at the conference – based on informal reports - upholds the right to strike and pattern bargaining, supports the lifting of restrictions on solidarity industrial action, calls for portable long-service leave and a shorter working week, a better deal for apprentices and insists on the right of workers to have a voice in setting their own hours and work arrangements in order to get a better life-work balance.

“The economics policy also calls for – thanks to the NSW delegation’s advocacy - democratic control of the economy and public ownership of natural monopolies and essential public services. How much of this has been diluted and contradicted by illusions about markets, corporations and tax reforms, that have also been added, is the subject for another analysis.”

It is clear that there is great pressure on the Greens to sell its soul to the rich and powerful 1% that rule society. All of us who are committed to the real change that is needed to build an ecologically sustainable and socially just future have a real stake in this struggle in the Greens.

Green Left Weekly needs your support to campaign against this insidious intervention by the 1% and their agents, but also tell the truth about how the Greens politicians are standing up to this pressure.

Please donate to the GLW fighting fund at greenleft.org.au. Direct deposits can also be made to Greenleft, Commonwealth Bank, BSB 062-006, Account No. 00901992. Otherwise, you can send a cheque or money order to PO Box 515, Broadway NSW 2007 or donate on the toll-free line at 1800 634 206 (within Australia).


Comments

Good to see some reporting on the Greens' conference, but seriously guys, you've got to tone down the opinions and report the facts as they stand.
The machine men are at it again. Now they want to sell the ALP as some mediocre, confused right-wing alternative to the Coalitions well grounded extreme Right-Wing party. Labor needs the Greens as a political ally and an ideological one. Labor has already rotted so badly within and it's very much showing on the outside. The machine men are damaging both parties. All they ever do is damage! Why can't they just be kicked out and left to seek a job in the greedy corporate sector? Or can they find another job? Since they are men of bad character. I just hope the Greens don't sell out and they continue to be strong, even without the ALP.
The point of the paper is to help us fight in an ideological battle against the corporate mass media, "reporting the facts as they stand" isn't gonna do that by itself.
Given the lack of primary votes that socialist parties receive at elections, aren't they the 1%.
Everything that is wrong with politics in Australia is because no-one is willing to present the facts as they stand to the Australian public and let them decide. Everyone, including GLW is spinning.
The ALP has its conference out in the open, yet the Greens still insist on shutting away any scrutiny or accountability with its closed doors party conference.
So what specifically are you disputing in this article? Something Hall Greenland wrote in the blogpost and I quoted in this article?
The reason that the Greens National Council is secret is because it is impossible to have a frank and open debate with journalists ready to mis-represent or de-contextualise anything that they think will run. The result of the ALP and Liberals having an open national conference is that deals are stitched beforehand to avoid controversy thus defeating the purpose of the openness in the first place.
Ridiculous. The Greens Party Council can't be open because the media will mis-represent proceedings...yet Wikileaks is supported for revealing what goes on behind other closed doors. You can't demand certain political organisations be open and accountability, while others remain secretive.

You need Green Left, and we need you!

Green Left is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.