As the far right grows, its mask comes off

Issue 
An anti abortion protest in Washington DC in January.

The brutal face of hard right and fascist reaction has been on vivid display on the issues of women’s rights and the climate crisis in the past few weeks.

In Germany the AfD (Alliance for Germany) launched a vicious attack on inspirational teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg, portraying her as an extremist and suggesting she needs treatment for her “psychosis” — a shabby reference to her autism.

Rejecting near-unanimous scientific opinion, the AfD said that the climate justice movement is scare mongering about levels of carbon dioxide emissions, asserting that the gas is a beneficial plant nutrient. Climate change denial is an open position of British Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage, who claims that the climate crisis is a scam forced on the world by “globalists” as part of their plan to impose world government. De facto climate change denial is also a position of the right-wing Liberal-National Coalition in Australia, which was returned to power on May 18.

Italian deputy premier Matteo Salvini is a climate change denier. On May 8 Italy refused to sign up to the Paris Agreement objective of zero emissions by 2050. Marine Le Pen’s Rassemblement Nationale wants to pull France out of the Paris climate change treaty because it is a “communist project”. Denial of the climate crisis is a standard hard-right and fascist position, more and more openly revealed.

The attack on abortion rights by United States President Donald Trump’s supporters is reaching fever pitch, and now the hard right and Christian fundamentalists see the possibility of achieving their ultimate goal — a total ban on all abortion throughout the country. The May 14 decision by the Alabama legislature to outlaw nearly all abortions will now be reviewed in the Supreme Court, which in turn seems likely to uphold the ban, effectively overturning the 1973 Roe v Wade judgement that legalised abortion.

Results in the May Spanish election gave the fascist Vox party 2.6 million votes and 23 seats in the parliament. Amazingly, the Vox political breakthrough came on the back of its defence of five men charged with gang rape at the Pamplona “running of the bulls” festival in 2016. The men, who called themselves “the wolf pack” and included two soldiers and a policeman, claimed the victim had consented, using video on their mobile phones showing the victim silent with her eyes closed as their “evidence”.

The court decision to reject a rape charge and only convict the men of assault caused outrage and huge demonstrations in response. But Vox realised that its target audience — the most reactionary sections of Spanish society — would sympathise with a narrative that demonised the victim and her supporters.

Vox claims that much of the outrage about sexual violence is caused by “radical feminists” who are “extremists”, and in any case ignores the “real” rapists who — according to Vox — are mainly immigrants. Francisco Serrano, a Vox leader in Andalusia, frequently tweets his contempt for “feminazis”. But Spanish surveys show that about 65% of college-age women regard themselves as feminists.

According to Meaghan Beatley’s article in Public Radio International (PRI):

“Chief among Vox’s anti-feminist measures, as provided in a 100-point program, is the repeal of a 2004 Gender Violence Law designed to better protect women from domestic violence and better prosecute offenders. The party also calls for the dissolution of federally funded feminist organisations; the creation of a Family Ministry in lieu of the current Gender Ministry; and removing sex change and abortion procedures from public health services.”

In the past decade it may have appeared that the new hard right and fascist movements were soft-pedalling their rabid reactionary positions on women’s rights, the environment and LGBTI issues. For example, Le Pen claimed she was gay and lesbian friendly and wanted “to protect our gays and Jews” — from Muslims of course. At the same time, she opposes same sex marriage and defends “family values”.

But the tendency of the far right to hide its reactionary positions on just about everything, while concentrating on targeting migrants, is changing. As the far right gains more votes and feels more confident it brings to the fore its core reactionary social positions.

Since coming to power in 2016, Trump has withdrawn the US from the Paris climate treaty and purged the Environmental Protection Agency, whose new chief administrator, Andrew Wheeler, is a climate change denier. The agency has reversed a series of Barack Obama-era restrictions, including on logging, oil and coal drilling, oil prospecting in the Arctic and vehicle emission standards.

When his own administration's two-year, 1500-page study on climate change found that “human activities … are the dominant cause” of global warming, and that annual losses in some sectors could reach “hundreds of billions of dollars by the end of the century,” Trump responded, “I don't believe it.” He also tried to bury the report by releasing it the day after Thanksgiving.

While the Trump administration’s offensive against climate justice is ongoing, the reactionary offensive being foregrounded now is against abortion rights. Alabama has now followed Georgia and Mississippi in passing legislation that bans virtually all abortions.

Jamelle Boule explains that Trump’s own shift from being pro-choice to anti-abortion was about getting evangelical Christians onboard for the wider plan:

“The animating impulse of the Trump (election) campaign — the beating heart of “Make America Great Again” — was a defence of traditional hierarchies. Trump promised … to strengthen privileges of race, wealth and gender. His personal life was defined by its hedonism, excess and contempt for traditional moralities. But he pitched himself as a bulwark against demographic and cultural change, a symbol of white patriarchal manhood aligned against immigrants, feminists and racial minorities.”

In other words, the anti-abortion project is the crucial symbol of an alliance, including Christian fundamentalists, that harks back to a safer epoch of stable factory jobs and conservative Church values, an epoch unencumbered by economic crisis, declining industries, culture wars or gender and ethnic conflicts.

This lost white working-class and middle-class paradise, a parody of the 1950s, never actually existed. It is an invention generated by numerous far right and conservative politicians as the useful myth around which to fight for ‘traditional values’.

Now the Trump administration wants to deepen its international anti-abortion crusade.  US organisations have long campaigned internationally against abortion. US governments since Ronald Reagan have restricted funding to organisations that fund abortions or reproductive health advice.

As Sarah Boseley explained in The Guardian:

“In March, the US extended the gag, stating that any organisation counselling women on abortion and using funds from elsewhere — even from its own government or a donor in another country — will no longer be eligible for any US funding. The diktat applies to all global health organisations. HIV and children’s charities must sign up to the pledge, alongside those running sexual and reproductive health clinics”.

The issues of reproductive rights and sexual violence are closely linked — both are about maintaining patriarchal hierarchies. Sexual violence is a worldwide epidemic, particularly prevalent where governments or movements that aim at enforcing extreme gender, ethnic or class hierarchies are in power or strong.

The sexual violence crisis in India has worsened since the 2014 election of Prime Minister Narendra Modi of the Hindu fundamentalist BJP. The rape and brutalisation of Muslim and other non-Hindu women by Hindu men, as well as communal violence in general, is defended by extreme right trends in the BJP.

For example, in January 2018 an eight-year-old girl named Asifa was imprisoned in a Kashmir Hindu temple, repeatedly raped and eventually murdered. The men accused of her murder were defended by a new communalist-fascist group called Hindu Ekta Manch (Forum for Hindu Unity), which organised rallies that officials of the BJP attended.

Asifa (who appeared to have no other name) was a member of a nomadic ethnic group known as Bakarwals. In India the extreme misogyny of Hindu fundamentalists goes hand in hand with ethnic discrimination.

The gender violence epidemic is also driven by fundamentalist Islamist groups like Boko Haram and Daesh (ISIS). An extremely high proportion of their women captives have been compulsorily “married” and become pregnant. Rape goes hand in hand with reproductive coercion, and reproductive coercion is a form of extreme violence against women, the ultimate aim of the far-right anti-abortionists.

In the US, in Spain, in Germany and elsewhere, the far right has reckoned that reactionary positions on gender violence, abortion and climate change can be positions that garner support from the most backward sections of the population. But as we have seen over abortion in the US, the “wolf pack” gang rape in Spain, and the school students’ climate crisis strikes all over Europe, these issues cause a huge polarisation in society.

As opinion polls have shown in the United States, a majority exists against reaction on these issues. The climate justice movement and movements for women’s fundamental rights can and must be crucial parts of an international fightback against the fascists and hard right bigots. The interests of the overwhelming majority of humanity are at stake.

[First published at leftunity.org]

Become a Green Left supporter today and get the first month free!

Green Left aims to make all content available online, without paywalls. We rely on regular support and donations from readers like you.

Any reader who becomes a $5, $10 or $20 per month supporter between August 3 and 11 will get the first month free.