BY
PATRICK QUINN
CHICAGO — On February 15, close to 10,000 Chicagoans participated
in a spirited march and demonstration opposing the impending US war against
Iraq. Given the brutally cold weather, the size of the march was all the
more remarkable.
Organisers took an imaginative departure from traditional marches and
demonstrations in Chicago by routing the march down Devon Avenue on the
city's far northside, home to the city's large Indian and Pakistani community.
Previous demonstrations had been held in or near Chicago's city centre,
the “Loop”, which is very sterile and relatively empty on weekends. In
contrast, the Devon area was very much alive.
The change of venue facilitated a change in the composition of the marchers.
Unlike previous demonstrations, the march included a considerable number
of South Asians and other people of colour. While there was no significant
African-American presence and relatively few Mexican-Americans, for the
first time ever a march was not monochromatically white.
Participants were mainly young people but there were also sizeable numbers
of people who had been activists who opposed the US war in Vietnam more
than three decades ago. Many carried hand-lettered signs and banners. Groups
of friends and co-workers learned about the march from the internet, arranged
to meet at locations near the assembly point and formed their own contingents.
The breadth of the participants was evidenced by the presence of many church
groups from Chicago's suburbs, contingents of high school and grammar school
students and whole families. All in all, it was a most encouraging event.
The march and demonstration in Chicago paled in comparison to the massive
turnouts in New York and San Francisco, and especially the major cities
of Europe. But it nonetheless reflected the growing anti-war sentiment
in the US. It has been estimated that there were more than 1600 separate
anti-war demonstrations of one kind or another throughout the country on
February 15. Never before has there been this level of anti-war sentiment
in the United States prior to the beginning of a war, the isolationist
sentiment preceding World War II notwithstanding.
Sadly, it seems that US President George Bush and the cabal of war hawks
at the core of his administration are determined to launch an attack on
Iraq despite the massive global opposition.
To be sure, there will be some drop-off in anti-war sentiment in the
US if the United Nations were to sanction the war. And there will be another
drop in anti-war sentiment once the war begins. However, the ultimate sustainability
of the anti-war movement will depend upon the duration of the war, the
number of US casualties, the number of Iraqi civilian casualties and the
degree of devastation visited on Iraq by the US.
Several factors are contributing to the rise on anti-war sentiment:
the perceived injustice of, and lack of logical rationale or provocation
for, a war against Iraq; a desire to be left alone in peace and live a
normal life in the wake of 9/11; and a realisation that the US economy
is in serious trouble and the government should give it its highest priority
of attention.
While the anti-war sentiment expressed on February 15 may not deter
Bush and his cabal from waging war on Iraq, it will certainly be an inhibiting
factor as Bush et al consider the next venue for imposing the New World
Order.
[Patrick Quinn is an activist in the US socialist organisation Solidarity.]
From Green Left Weekly, February 26, 2003.
Visit the Green Left Weekly
home page.