BY RAHUL MAHAJAN
Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat stunned the world yesterday
by demanding that the United States hold democratic elections for a new
chief executive before it attempts to continue in its role as broker between
Israel and Palestine.
“[George] Bush is tainted by his association with Jim-Crow-style selective
disenfranchisement and executive strongarm tactics in a south-eastern province
controlled by his brother”, said Arafat, who was elected with 87% of the
vote in 1996 elections in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, declared to be
free and fair by international observers, including former US president
Jimmy Carter. “Our count shows that he would have lost the election if
his associates hadn't deprived so many thousands of African Americans,
an oppressed minority, of the right to vote. He is not the man to bring
peace to the Middle East.”
Hugo Chavez, elected president of Venezuela with 62% of the popular
vote, concurred with Arafat. Chavez has long been a victim of Bush's anti-democratic
attitude, as the Bush administration funnelled hundreds of thousands of
dollars through the National Endowment for Democracy to anti-Chavez forces
and reportedly gave the go-ahead for an attempted military coup by those
forces.
“After it was over and I was back in power”, said Chavez, “his administration
actually told me `legitimacy is not conferred by a majority vote'. Unless,
of course, it's a majority of the Supreme Court. I respect the local traditions,
however quaint, of the United States, but he hardly sets the best example
for the Middle East, does he? Why don't we get back to that idea of an
international conference to settle the question of Palestine?”
Bush was not without his supporters, however. Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon, elected head of a country that legally discriminates among
its citizens on the basis of religious belief, forbids political candidates
from advocating an end to that discrimination, and disenfranchises an entire
people through military occupation, dismissed Arafat's call as “absurd”.
Hamid Karzai, recently “elected” head of Afghanistan by a grand council,
or loya jirga, in which a foreign body, controlled by the United
States, selected delegates; unelected warlords who had ravaged the country
were permitted to control the meeting and to threaten delegates who refused
to vote their way; and the US special envoy to Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad,
refused to allow at least two other candidates to stand for election, added
his support for Bush in his hour of need.
Said Karzai, “In Afghanistan, we have the loya jirga. In the United
States, you have your own process — as we understand, it's traditional
over there for corporations to play a large part in electing officials
and writing legislation. We're very interested in looking into that kind
of system ourselves.”
Vojislav Kostunica, chosen head of Yugoslavia in an election where the
US spent an estimated US$25 million to influence the results, was also
keen to rush to Bush's defence, indicating that he saw no procedural problems
with the 2000 elections.
And Mahathir Mohamad of Malaysia, long derided for his claim that “Asian
culture” is at odds with universal human rights, added: “The elections
are strictly an internal matter, and should have no bearing on the status
of the United States as a broker. The Palestinians' high-handedness is
a serious threat to national independence.”
In a surprise move, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, long an ally
of the US, supported Arafat's call, saying, “While we're at it, let's take
another look at our agreement on American independence. George Washington
was not only unelected, he did rather associate with terrorists. Benedict
Arnold would have been a much more suitable partner for peace, n'est
ce pas?”
Arafat, busy working on a plan to find a new Israeli leader not tainted
with the massacre of hundreds of innocents in Sabra and Shatila to negotiate
with, could not be reached for further comment.
[From < http://www.counterpunch.org>. Rahul Mahajan is the author
of The New Crusade: America's War on Terrorism.]
From Green Left Weekly, July 10, 2002.
Visit the Green Left Weekly
home page.