`The Philippines left needs to appreciate the national question'
ABRINO AYDINAN, a leader of the Cordillera Peoples Liberation Army-Cordillera
Bodong Administration (CPLA-CBA) and an executive council member of the
Socialist Party of Labour (SPP), spoke to Green Left Weekly's REIHANA
MOHIDEEN.
I joined the New People's Army (NPA) in 1969. I was one of the first
field commanders of the NPA. When I was captured in 1971, we had already
established bases in the Cordilleras.
The national democratic program [the immediate program of the Communist
Party of the Philippines (CPP)] included the recognition of the right to
self-determination of the indigenous peoples. This attracted a lot of activists
from the indigenous peoples' movement to the NPA.
A number of [CPP members] from the Cordilleras proposed the creation
of a Moro National Liberation Front-type [the MNLF is one of the national
liberation movements representing the Moro peoples in the southern Philippines]
organisation for the Cordilleras. This initiative was suppressed by the
CPP central committee.
The pressure for this never let up, until the CPLA was formed. The CPLA
seceded from the CPP in February 1986. It at first remained within the
NPA, but left a few months later. I was also involved in a group which
called for the separation of the Cordillera nation, which would later be
a part of a federated structure in a revolutionary Philippines state. We
called this the seventh column of the CPP. But the CPP wasn't even prepared
to consider our program.
In the Philippines, the indigenous people are peoples of the indigenous
culture who were able to maintain themselves outside the control of the
Spanish colonial state. Therefore, they were able to preserve indigenous
Philippines culture. This includes social elements such as collective leadership
and direct democracy. We refer to these as being a part of our indigenous
socialist vision. The existence of these egalitarian institutions is our
contribution to the Philippines revolutionary movement.
We need to launch a cultural revolution which will defend socialism
-- as a philosophy, a way of life and as a model of development -- from
the slanders of global capitalist forces. We also need a socialism that
will be able to study in depth and critically the situation on a local
and international level. I see a cultural revolution as a necessary prerequisite
to the emergence of a new revolutionary movement. When I speak of cultural
revolution, I mean a propaganda movement like that of the 1890s led by
Rizal and Bonifacio [leaders of the 1896 revolution against Spanish rule].
The key elements of such a cultural revolution is an organisation that
will advocate and actively cultivate a socialist consciousness amongst
the people and be able to send spokespeople into various fora, including
the congress of the Philippines. Our representatives must project the socialist
platform. We also need our own media, periodicals and publications. These
are also essential to clear the image of socialism.
What we need is a socialist movement that is capable of generating new
forces of the Philippines revolutionary movement and of uniting all the
different socialist traditions and tendencies. The basic ideas of Marx
are still relevant. The task of the Filipino socialists is to go back to
the basic socialist principles in the Communist Manifesto. These
ideas of Marx and Engels reflect the basic principles, which have continuing
validity. So too do the principles expounded by Lenin and other socialist
leaders such as Mao and even Trotsky.
I would like to congratulate the leaders of the SPP on their initiative
in forming the party. I think new hope has developed for the unification
of the revolutionary movement. Now, more than ever, we are able to succeed
in the tasks of the Philippines revolution.
The inability of the Philippines left to deal with the national question
was reflected in its resistance to accommodate movements for self-determination
such as those of the Cordillera and Moro peoples. While now the left seems
to take for granted the causes of ``indigenous'' peoples, it still misunderstands
the various dimensions of the national question because not all communities
are nations.
The indigenous movements that are now ``officially'' supported by the
left have alienated themselves from the overall movement and struggle of
the Filipino people. In this sense the Philippines left still needs to
appreciate the national question.
We are still in the process of forging the Philippines nation. This
means recognising the smaller nations inside the Philippines nation. This
implies the recognition that the organisation of the Philippines should
be a federation -- this is unavoidable.